Search found 123 matches
- Thu May 16, 2024 12:17 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Dave Allen's three supposedly pre-Eusebian witnesses to the Testimonium Flavianum
- Replies: 5
- Views: 142
Re: Dave Allen's three supposedly pre-Eusebian witnesses to the Testimonium Flavianum
Funnily enough, Paul's information about the historical Jesus does not go beyond the information known from Josephus. Apparently, the author of Paul and his letters did not come up with the idea to add a "backwards" narrative to Jesus (from resurrection to birth). He preferred to write the...
- Thu May 16, 2024 11:58 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Dave Allen's three supposedly pre-Eusebian witnesses to the Testimonium Flavianum
- Replies: 5
- Views: 142
Re: Dave Allen's three supposedly pre-Eusebian witnesses to the Testimonium Flavianum
We have an alternative: 1. TF was written by Eusebius or someone else around the 4th century CE and inserted into Ant Josephus. Luke's signature language was used. 2. The TF is authentic and it was Luke who used the TF when creating the gospel and the Acts of the Apostles. Recently, biblical scholar...
- Sun May 12, 2024 7:47 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Flavius Two-Face Josephus
- Replies: 0
- Views: 154
Flavius Two-Face Josephus
Dave Allen's path to the reconstruction of TF led through Jesus the Zealot, proposed by SGF Brandon, developed by Fernando Burmejo-Rubio and commercially used by Reza Aslan. Over time, Dave focused on the literature itself by Josephus. Dave paid particular attention to the literary constructs used b...
- Sat May 11, 2024 10:48 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Last nail on the Testimonium Flavianum. Again.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 264
Re: Last nail on the Testimonium Flavianum. Again.
TF is legit for Poles. Dubarle reconstruction
- Wed May 08, 2024 10:49 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
- Replies: 25
- Views: 659
Re: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
Luke sondergut was developed throughout the period of creation under the influence of others up to the canonical text. The same for Mark and Matthew. They wrote together or used Teams
- Wed May 08, 2024 10:18 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
- Replies: 25
- Views: 659
Re: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
None of the synoptic gospels is a homogeneous work - they all contain content from different authors. Klinghardt argues that the homogeneous text is *Ev and that it was written by a single previously unrecognized author who wrote in a manner most reminiscent of Luke but sometimes resembles the style...
- Wed May 08, 2024 1:14 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
- Replies: 25
- Views: 659
- Tue May 07, 2024 10:56 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
- Replies: 25
- Views: 659
Re: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
the problem is the syntax of the reconstruction language. Klinghardt creates strange structures in koine to create a unique language for the new ghostwriter. This is not my conclusion, but linguists' conclusion. Ev was written by Luke and Matthew
- Tue May 07, 2024 8:55 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
- Replies: 25
- Views: 659
Re: Gospel muteness as evidence of anti-marcionism
This is Vinzent's problem - he deals with side issues and avoids real problems. The only significant problem of this Vinzent-Trobisch-Klinghardt environment is to indicate and prove that *Ev, which Marcion used, is a homogeneous publication of another ghostwriter. The only major problem. Nothing is ...
- Mon May 06, 2024 8:55 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Invention of Macrina the Younger?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 715