Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

"The prize of the early witness as it is before the Lucian Recension."

You believe in the Lucian Recension as an actual textual event?

"Revisiting the Date of Codex Sinaiticus" Announced on a few forums: =========== Wednesday, July 1, 10am CET, TeTra Seminar paper on Zoom: Brent Nongbri (MF Norwegian School of Theology) "Revisiting the Date of Codex Sinaiticus" If you'd like to attend, feel free to contact us at dan.batovici@kuleuv...

If you going to quote Richard Carrier as your source, what do you do with his many errors? ========= This is amusing: “All the earliest manuscripts extant, including the earliest complete bibles to survive, lack the LE; it begins to appear in the extant manuscript record only in the 4th century, whi...

‘All the earliest manuscripts extant, including the earliest complete bibles to survive, lack the LE;“ Allowing this to be NT only (correction). what is the reference here, plural other than the 1800s Sinaiticus. “ Even in translations, the earliest manuscripts (e.g. in Syriac and Latin) lack the LE...

Ulan wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:04 am

A theory is based on existing evidence

Joe is not offering a theory.

It is a simple question.
What is the theory of when, where, how and by who were the verses added.

Even just the when.

Also, was there an original Markan ending, lost?

So you really have no textual theory.
Thanks!

Why are you wasting so much time pretending to be doing textual analysis or criticism?

Joe, what is your theory for the creation of the last 12 verses of Mark? When? Where? And, if your position is that it is not original Mark, is your theory that the original ending was lost, or that Mark ended his text at verse 8? By whom? What language? Why? Was the author familiar with primary so...

Yes, it is a sunny day, and I hope to leave and have a nice walk, at least on the double cul-de-sac.

Thanks for the reminder!

whatever, why are you folks so absurd in discussion? And then you try to team up as a group of absurdists, so tacky. Why not actually quote my words? Then you could try to make a case that I offered more stuff. And why would I try to apologetically convince a group of non-Christian mythicist and qui...

More non-responsive stupidity from our triad of posters.