Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

There are other areas where we are working harder :) , as with Zosimas, .... The Zosimas project is looking for the right Greek-reading-savvy individual, or two, who would love a fascinating Greek-textual project. A good logical mind in looking at textual relationships. Working various angles, and ...

Interesting.

There is also interest in Har Nitai (or possibly Arbel) as the site of the real Nazareth.

thanks for the useless blah-blah. My question for Joe remains unanswered. ----------------------------------------------------------- Hi Joe, One point at a time. :) JW : All professional Paleographers that have studied it have concluded that Sinaiticus is early. First, can you name the professional...

Afaik, nobody in Bible text scholarship defends the idea today. About 50 years ago, Metzger put forth a confused equivocal attempt. The various recensions (three total) were in fact, a sine qua non of Hortian theory. However, critical text theory is like a Potemkin Village, even with all the foundat...

"The prize of the early witness as it is before the Lucian Recension."

You believe in the Lucian Recension as an actual textual event?

"Revisiting the Date of Codex Sinaiticus" Announced on a few forums: =========== Wednesday, July 1, 10am CET, TeTra Seminar paper on Zoom: Brent Nongbri (MF Norwegian School of Theology) "Revisiting the Date of Codex Sinaiticus" If you'd like to attend, feel free to contact us at dan.batovici@kuleuv...

If you going to quote Richard Carrier as your source, what do you do with his many errors? ========= This is amusing: “All the earliest manuscripts extant, including the earliest complete bibles to survive, lack the LE; it begins to appear in the extant manuscript record only in the 4th century, whi...

‘All the earliest manuscripts extant, including the earliest complete bibles to survive, lack the LE;“ Allowing this to be NT only (correction). what is the reference here, plural other than the 1800s Sinaiticus. “ Even in translations, the earliest manuscripts (e.g. in Syriac and Latin) lack the LE...

Ulan wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:04 am

A theory is based on existing evidence

Joe is not offering a theory.

It is a simple question.
What is the theory of when, where, how and by who were the verses added.

Even just the when.

Also, was there an original Markan ending, lost?

So you really have no textual theory.
Thanks!

Why are you wasting so much time pretending to be doing textual analysis or criticism?