Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

And, SA, as for your shotgun proposal, above Tue Apr 16, 2024 9:57 am, that WASPs
ganged up on Smith, wasn't Smith, um, a WASP?

Some old carbon ink is readable.
Ever heard of Dead Sea Scrolls?

No.
You apparently can't even bring yourself, yet, to consider, e.g., the new evidence in April Atlantic.
And you, still of and on wavering whether Clement wrote it.

There is, so far, no evidence that Smith mentioned "Secret Mark" to any monk in 1958 or 1959.

Wikipedia may not be the ultimate arbiter.

Whether cleaning house or spending a day in silence, it may be fair not to consider you a liar, cheat, and horse thief, given that you may not be a horse thief.

Do you write in archaic scripts?

No.
(Optional: Have you ever spent a day in quiet?)

Yes, a monk would use his own script.

Speaking of cleaning up, your act,
if the "declaration" knew of pre-1958 evidence, why didn't it cite it?
If you declare "Secret Mark" verses genuine
but the rest of Gospel of Mark non-genuine
how to pretend to combine these?