"...unwillingness to bring up Secret Mark was shared by Origen."
What, beyond silence, if anything expressible, possessed you to claim that about Origen?
Search found 2536 matches
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 2:29 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: back to the drawing board? the missing sondergut Marcion
- Replies: 37
- Views: 418
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 2:11 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
- Replies: 17
- Views: 165
Re: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
Try giving a reference first before giving your response next time?
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 2:09 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Marcion’s Gospel and the New Testament: Catalyst or Consequence?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 395
Re: Marcion’s Gospel and the New Testament: Catalyst or Consequence?
Back to maryhelena's question on publications. In some cases journal authors, or their institutions, are even required to pay a fee in order to be published in a journal. (I never did this.) An opposite extreme is some free nonsense on the internet. One hopeful development is some publications, howe...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 2:02 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
- Replies: 17
- Views: 165
Re: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
You have still not explained the proposal of Daniel McClellan to which you decided that your reaction was something appropriate for others here to read.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:54 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Let's help biblical scholars - Paul's letters
- Replies: 17
- Views: 275
Re: Let's help biblical scholars - Paul's letters
Not everyone researches bible the same way. Not news.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:52 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
- Replies: 17
- Views: 165
Re: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
Another try: what "crazy theories" of Daniel McClellan are to responding to?
Or: why this update on your unspecified opinions?
Or: why this update on your unspecified opinions?
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:40 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: back to the drawing board? the missing sondergut Marcion
- Replies: 37
- Views: 418
Re: back to the drawing board? the missing sondergut Marcion
It may be that Marcion's main historical consequence was in proposing a canon, that in part, but not by itself, helped prompt others to (slowly) expedite an alternate canon.
It may well be that Marcion had no new verses, maybe mostly just Luke.
It may well be that Marcion had no new verses, maybe mostly just Luke.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:19 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
- Replies: 17
- Views: 165
Re: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
To rephrase. You tell us your view of Daniel McClellan, as if readers here should want to know that.
But I, for one, do not know who Daniel McClellan is nor what he claims.
So, not for the first time, please, if you post, give an indication what you are responding to.
Or, consider stop wasting time.
But I, for one, do not know who Daniel McClellan is nor what he claims.
So, not for the first time, please, if you post, give an indication what you are responding to.
Or, consider stop wasting time.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:05 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
- Replies: 17
- Views: 165
Re: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
Without a link or quote or reference, your personal reactions are mere self-important diary notes.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 12:35 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Let's help biblical scholars - Paul's letters
- Replies: 17
- Views: 275
Re: Let's help biblical scholars - Paul's letters
Peter K. asked how are you helping here, I assume in reference to the thread title.
If I may add, an attempt to divide the audience into two separate groups, bible scholars and rational savants, is
a rookie move.
If I may add, an attempt to divide the audience into two separate groups, bible scholars and rational savants, is
a rookie move.