Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Not a question of "winning a debate" with you.
This may be a lose-lose situation.
One hopes, though, there are better readers out there.

A 1976 certificate claim is not proof of that, no, answered.
Like conflicting claims that I just mentioned.

Do you even read:
"Consider the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
Do different monks claim different ownership to portions and times?"

No apology for claiming Smith hurt me.
On to the next false claim?
Consider the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
Do different monks claim different ownership to portions and times?

There is no evidence the book was in Mar Saba before 1958. It does not appear in the books catalogs there--
as has been noted,
repeatedly.

No, I mentioned Ben C. Smith as one indication why most scholars would not come or stay here.

Obviously one need not have seen the document before 1958 to think it legit. Like, say, you.
You are a faster typist than I am. Do you just hope to wear people down?

Seraphim, iiuc, was merely claiming the Voss book as Mar Saba properly, finders keepers.

Seraphim, as far as I have read, did not claim to have seen the document before 1958.

Of course some claims of expertise are bogus. Being an engineer or a content provider or a computer coder or a history "tidier" or self-proclaimed story expert may not count for much when declaring here what's what. Today I tried again explicitly to acknowledge that A. T.'s report ranged f...