Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

So, S. A., are you now claiming A.T.'s paleographic dating was mistaken, maybe because you are more "intuitive" than he?

And that is your prerogative.

What I attempted to do in this thread is to separate two questions:
1) the date of the Voss hand, modern according to A. T.
and
2) who did that.
Maybe I have failed to make that distinction, with some.

Consider this a report of biased "moderation"--but you may move it, again, it to "nowhere."

The more the "moderation" here is biased, the more scholarly progress will occur elsewhere.

I am attempting to "distinguish" the question of the date of the Voss handwriting
from who penned that handwriting.
Different questions.

Tselikas is qualified to say, and did say, that it is not 18th-century writing.
He is not qualified to say which modern writer imitated it.

Your dishonesty is saddening.

For you to pretend to limit his expertise suchly, after extolling it repeatedly, is amoral.

A. T. is indeed paleographically expert in dating writing.
Do you ever tire of obscurantist deflection?

He is qualified, and did say, that it is not 18th-century writing.
He is not qualified to say which modern writer imitated it.
Is that too hard for you to see?