Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Well it tells you what everyone knew a long time ago. Scholars willing to believe another scholar is capable of heinous acts are only projecting their own lack of integrity.

Lying and misleading the forum with arguments that the poster knows are untrue should be punished with more severity than the breaking of other protocols. This is the second time he has DELIBERATELY posted things he knows are untrue. Deception is despicable.

This cannot be a ligature for -menos. It's a lie.

Why is lying necessary to win the Secret Mark debate? Tselikas did not lie. Ken is lying for the sake of the team. This so fucking bad.

Second time he's lied. Last time he used low resolution images on purpose and you moved it to the trash.

There are no "rules" for 18th century handwriting. Tselikas is the expert. There are many different ways to write things. He notes correctly the ligatures used by the author. To bring forward a list of "rules" is a joke. Ban Ken for this. This is a joke. A complete lie. Not even ...

Ken should be banned for a week.

Ken should be banned for a week.

It doesn't even require a comment on my part. It is literally nothing more than a denial of shared reality. Whatever "expert(s)" (= Carlson) you consulted shares your delusion not seeing the clear mu there. I've said it before and it got me banned. At least Goranson just repeats old claims...

You're simply not capable of even pretending to see any other point of view than what you have decided is the truth. So in this case, the argument that there was a book of Clement of Alexandria in the Mar Saba library only works if you assume a priori that Morton Smith is the forger. What you can't ...