Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

the blind man wasn't possessed though! this idea of keeping of secrets is definitely in there He replied, “The mystery of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to those on the outside everything is expressed in parables where i got this from is the Odes there's a place it says 'keep my myste...

yes that's it, the first part נצר (nasar), meaning either to be watchful [or to guard or to keep] the 2nd part would be Raz a common enough word (Persian loan originally) used in Peshitta NT anyway rz, rzˀ (rāz, rāzā) n.m. mystery, secret Syr, CPA ܐܪܙ‏, ܐܪܐܙܐ‏; CPA initial /r/ forms: ܪܙ ‏, ܪܐܙ ‏, Sa...

Nazarene means keeper of the mystery in Aramaic, entirely inline with the demoniac's statement of 'knowing who he is' and in-line with Jesus other statements

this is all very interesting especially the classic quotes in corinthians and acts
but.... too much information!

there needs to be a concordance to easily look up which passages have classic parallels otherwise it's impossible to get a clear picture

I'm glad to here it! I like to know why i'm confused but it's not a feminist theory if you think that's what happened though and they all stole off her and didn't attribute, that happens. someone that opposes feminism isn't going to come up with a theory like that but it doesn't mean only someone t...

Everything's fine, Martin. That was also meant to be a little ironic. Nevertheless, there are currently many who are developing theories according to which the original is exactly what they particularly like. And I'll stick with it that it would be exactly the same, if I were to develop some femini...

i do assume that a tiny sprinkle of verses in the epistles were added, acknowledging David yes

i don't count Romans 9:4-5 as being Davidic though
you found one in Romans 1:3 and there's one more somewhere between Romans and Jude

KK Martijn's proposal is the opposite of superstition, he claims it based on analytical methods. it's exactly what I wanted to hear

Anyone can see David is not in the epistles or pastorals It as actually possible to simplifiy this - The gospels and Acts are Davidic and the rest isn't, bar Revelation of course Anyone can see the Jesus of the gospels has a long shot of being the Messiah if he is really masterful at it. It's at lea...

there seem slightly more Chrestos references than Christos