Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

I am attempting to "distinguish" the question of the date of the Voss handwriting
from who penned that handwriting.
Different questions.

Tselikas is qualified to say, and did say, that it is not 18th-century writing.
He is not qualified to say which modern writer imitated it.

Your dishonesty is saddening.

For you to pretend to limit his expertise suchly, after extolling it repeatedly, is amoral.

A. T. is indeed paleographically expert in dating writing.
Do you ever tire of obscurantist deflection?

He is qualified, and did say, that it is not 18th-century writing.
He is not qualified to say which modern writer imitated it.
Is that too hard for you to see?

His dating was from paleography!
Not from graphology!
Why, do you suppose, most game-changing conversations don't happen here?

He, the best expert, already gave them.
My restatement, in this case, like yours, is of less value.

Rather, I'm suggesting that, in terms of contradicting the paleography assessment by A. T.,
Peter Kirby and Secret Alias
got nothin'.

One possibility, though I do not claim certainty:
you two (maybe?) prefer to think that the Voss book contains 18th-century writing,
even though he denies that.