Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

I don't understand about celibacy and catecbumens, how do you get lay people who can marry if the y weren't catechumens first?

Because in orthodox christianity you're allowed to fuck

Lot of bad blood between sectarians during the Novation schism

The key weakness of textual criticism using it to entrench one's position by using church edited texts that date to over a century or more from the purported composition date.

I'm partial to the idea that the 'Daughters of Phillip' were a women's religious order.

so Roy Moore was right all along.

It is a good book, I got a little bogged down in the second half when he analyzes the Q sayings as I'm not well read in the Q-two source hypothesis arguments, but the first half is fascinating and really drives home the point that at least Luke is later and reviewed 'many' sources in composing his g...

vridar has reviewed MacDonald's Two Shipwrecked Gospels where he reconstructs what he thinks the format of Papias' Exposition was like, IOW it's not just a sayings collection as you're implying

https://vridar.org/2018/04/18/reconstru ... c-problem/

it's his CONSTANT use of HYPERBOLE and overstatement. Proof is a high standard. Stop saying something is "proved" when nothing has been proved. It's so fucking annoying. Giuseppe is a complete simpleton add ridiculous deference to argument from authority, when it supports his suppositions

it's more like throwing up on