Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

"If a monk wanted to record "Clement" why not do it instead in the Clement edition owned in Mar Saba?" I already supported this today. The 1715 two-volume folio edition of Clement attested at Mar Saba would be a much more plausible place to annotate a Clement addition then in a V...

Smith was a Christianity lover, then a Christianity hater.
Sure, I defend that statement.
Why misrepresent my position?

The authorship is more consonant with Smith than Clement.

I defend them all.
Was it this one that offended you:
"Tselikas' expertise of an imitation of earlier text, an imitation that could have been any time until 1958."?
Absolutely, an imitation can have occured in the 1950s.

18 or so arguments.

These ARE sound arguments, imo.

I notice that you, Mr. Kirby, ask if "any of these" be sound. Whereas, need I repeat, these are cumulative, and not comprehensive (because there are even other) indications--some stronger than others admittedly--, or, at least they were presented by me as such. I recognize that maybe you, ...

Hiya, Joe. Thanks. I did wonder if anyone would get a chuckle from my writing that Morton Smith was interested in the bitter humor of J. [Jonathan] Swift, not to be confused with T. [Taylor] Swift. Three bitters! Oh well, tough crowd. ("The Influence of Arbuthnot upon Swift," by R. Morton ...

According to WorldCat
the Vossius book was 20 cm, 4to
the 1715 Clement ed was 40 cm, folio--and two volumes.
Plenty of room to annotate
But you SA/SH already erased a claim it was small......

For example, I wrote in my dissertation, on Nazareth, a section, pages 105 to 122, and elsewhere.