Search found 225 matches
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:44 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
- Replies: 90
- Views: 80610
Re: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
^A "deep love and obsession with the Bible" is not the same as being a "fundamentalist" towards a historical reading. Bob Price I'm sure would also say he has a "deep love and obsession with the Bible, with interest relating to the NT and Christian Origins" etc. One on...
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:42 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
- Replies: 90
- Views: 80610
Re: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
Gullota is simply a fundie who takes anything in the Gospels, as well, Gospel. ... Hey, if the Bible says it, Gullotta believes it, and doesn't question it. According to his biography, he's an agnostic-atheist. So I can't see how these statements of yours can be correct. I really detest this line o...
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:49 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
- Replies: 90
- Views: 80610
Re: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
https://danielngullotta.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/the-lost-gospel-and-the-so-called-marriage-of-jesus/ Gullota is simply a fundie who takes anything in the Gospels, as well, Gospel. 'Some of the named women include Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Susanna, Mary and Martha, all of which helped and supported Je...
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:28 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
- Replies: 90
- Views: 80610
Re: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
DANIEL N. GULLOTTA To say this is a fringe theory is a bit of an understatement. No scholar employed by a major university holds this view ... If scholars engage with the Christ Myth theory, it might only serve to give credence to an otherwise fringe view ... I have even considered taking on the is...
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:26 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
- Replies: 90
- Views: 80610
Re: How mythicists are perceived by students and academics
http://danielngullotta.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/on-the-challenges-of-engaging-and-not-engaging-with-the-christ-myth-theory On the Challenges of Engaging and Not Engaging the Christ Myth Theory by DANIEL N. GULLOTTA Poor Ehrman and McGrath. They are met by a lot of internet hate, and all they did is...
- Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:13 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
- Replies: 135
- Views: 86191
Re: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
So John T ducks the question of why Paul does not mention any miracles of Jesus, while insisting that if an author does not mention something it is ONLY because it has not happened yet.
- Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:47 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
- Replies: 135
- Views: 86191
Re: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
John T continues to duck the question of why Paul never mentions any miracles of Jesus, or why Luke never mentions Lazarus being raised from the dead. Why does Luke never write that Jesus had a brother called James? Allegedly, the killing of the brother of James should have been written about by Luk...
- Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:22 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
- Replies: 135
- Views: 86191
Re: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
Answer: Perhaps for the simple reason Luke/Acts was written before their deaths took place. You still haven't explained why Paul doesn't mention a single miracle of Jesus. Or why Luke never states that Jesus had a brother called James. How can Luke write that the brother of Jesus, called James, was...
- Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:48 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
- Replies: 135
- Views: 86191
Re: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
" Luke copies Mark. Mark is post-70. Luke also uses Josephus' *Antiquities* which puts him in the 90's. The author did not know Paul and does not even know his letters. Luke did not know any witnesses or interview any witnesses. This is pretty much all settled scholarship." ...Diogenes th...
- Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:37 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
- Replies: 135
- Views: 86191
Re: Acts as fiction by Richard Carrier
AVERY
(If any skeptic is capable of that dialog, without relying on theories of NT error as a presupposition.)
CARR
Well, we can pretty much presuppose that any book has errors in it. That is not controversial except among people who claim that some books are special.
(If any skeptic is capable of that dialog, without relying on theories of NT error as a presupposition.)
CARR
Well, we can pretty much presuppose that any book has errors in it. That is not controversial except among people who claim that some books are special.