To rephrase. You tell us your view of Daniel McClellan, as if readers here should want to know that.
But I, for one, do not know who Daniel McClellan is nor what he claims.
So, not for the first time, please, if you post, give an indication what you are responding to.
Or, consider stop wasting time.
Search found 2569 matches
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:19 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
- Replies: 17
- Views: 285
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:05 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
- Replies: 17
- Views: 285
Re: A Comment on Daniel McClellan's On Going Social Media Efforts
Without a link or quote or reference, your personal reactions are mere self-important diary notes.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 12:35 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Let's help biblical scholars - Paul's letters
- Replies: 28
- Views: 712
Re: Let's help biblical scholars - Paul's letters
Peter K. asked how are you helping here, I assume in reference to the thread title.
If I may add, an attempt to divide the audience into two separate groups, bible scholars and rational savants, is
a rookie move.
If I may add, an attempt to divide the audience into two separate groups, bible scholars and rational savants, is
a rookie move.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 8:19 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Equal Opportunity Offender: The Authenticity Side Misrepresentation
- Replies: 33
- Views: 506
Re: Equal Opportunity Offender: The Authenticity Side Misrepresentation
I have written about pros and cons imo concerning the G. Smith/Landau book.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 8:00 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Equal Opportunity Offender: The Authenticity Side Misrepresentation
- Replies: 33
- Views: 506
Re: Equal Opportunity Offender: The Authenticity Side Misrepresentation
SA interprets "disputed as far as concerning its authenticity"
as "authenticity."
Typical.
as "authenticity."
Typical.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:33 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Marcion’s Gospel and the New Testament: Catalyst or Consequence?
- Replies: 33
- Views: 648
Re: Marcion’s Gospel and the New Testament: Catalyst or Consequence?
In my experience, maryhelena, generally, there's no pay for an article. For a book, depends on publisher and/or sales. One example: I was co-author of Origin of Kibosh: Routledge Studies in Etymology (All serious libraries should have a copy!) So far, royalties amount to less than the price of one c...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:22 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Nag Hammadi Codices and their Ancient Readers
- Replies: 1
- Views: 95
Nag Hammadi Codices and their Ancient Readers
open access: The Nag Hammadi Codices and their Ancient Readers Exploring Textual Materiality and Reading Practice AUTHOR: Paul Linjamaa, Lunds Universitet, Sweden, January 2024. Cambridge U.P. "Since their discovery in 1945, the Nag Hammadi Codices have generated questions and scholarly debate ...
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 6:29 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Marcion’s Gospel and the New Testament: Catalyst or Consequence?
- Replies: 33
- Views: 648
Re: Marcion’s Gospel and the New Testament: Catalyst or Consequence?
"I recently paid £21 for this article - of just 6 pages."
Wow, shameful.
(More than $4 a page.)
Wow, shameful.
(More than $4 a page.)
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 6:26 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: 1715 Clement edition
- Replies: 35
- Views: 687
Re: 1715 Clement edition
Whenever the Voss book entered Mar Saba, it is certified that the two-volume folio edition of Clement was indeed there, so that was certainly available to annotate.
- Mon Apr 22, 2024 6:01 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
- Replies: 113
- Views: 1817
Re: Distinguishing some questions about the "Letter to Theodore"
Joe, bro,
I'm sometimes skeptical of your skepticism.
Say, when you disdain when others question antiquity of "Secret Mark"--
seems pretty knee-jerk-y.
I'm sometimes skeptical of your skepticism.
Say, when you disdain when others question antiquity of "Secret Mark"--
seems pretty knee-jerk-y.