Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

A good starting point is the Sinaiticus Authenticity Research Team www.sinaiticus.net And I have a lot of information at: Sinaiticus - authentic antiquity or modern? http://www.purebibleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?65-Sinaiticus-authentic-antiquity-or-modern Two groups on Facebook - PureBible and Sina...

There were far more extensive material tests planned for the Leipzig parchment in 2015. Dr. Ira Rabin and the Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung, Berlin - BAM - who did superb DSS testing, were the crew. And I talked to the lady at Hofstra University in 2014, and she was quite excited ...

Here is an example of the issue in 2010: [textualcriticism] CSNTM's - request assistance on Codex Sinaiticus Project misinformation Steven Avery https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/textualcriticism/conversations/topics/5716 Eventually, the CSP site put up an easy-to-miss disclaimer. I had had a numb...

For years the CSP gave a faux translation, and fooled many readers into thinking it was a true translation. They had a translation that in many places simply did not follow Sinaiticus, it was following a TR-AV text. They thought it mattered so much that they were willing to deceive the millions of v...

Can you explain why the researchers below have not or are not allowed to translate major sections of the Codex-sinaiticus into English? http://www.codex-sinaiticus.net/en/manuscript.aspx?book=1&chapter=24&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0 Do you have a link to a website that does provide a...

The same errors from Bill Brown continue. If you want to really see his sickness in action, watch the BVDB board. It is not just the rant and vulgarity mode, there is also a logic gap, that makes discussion a waste of time. His point is to simply to be a diversion from the real discussions. Using hi...

Good info above, and the other thread about the apology. Especially the principles saying, “we no NDA”. Wallace, afaik, has already been asked a few times as to why and with whom he signed the NDA, which became key to the six years of absurd speculation drama. From the above, it looks likely that it...

Daniel Wallace used the ultra-dubious date simply for a tacky debate ambush with Ehrman. The only way you can set an ultra-tight terminus post quem is if there is connected corroboration, like a dated chariot receipt. Palaeography dating of scripts is not time-symmetrical, nobody can predict a futur...

Again, all responded to in the Lounge.

Answered in the lounge.