Did John know Mark?
Morton Smith, for what it's worth, in his unpublished 1960 text, claimed that "Secret Mark" was "shaped by deliberate imitation of canonical Mk."
[[hm., by whom? and not Secret Mark first, then censored]]
"but based in part on an earlier Aramaic gospel of which different Greek translations had been used independently by canonical Mk. and Jn."
JTS archive, box 10, folder 1.
Did John know Mark?
Re: Did John know Mark?
In Boismard's multiple-source hypothesis, Mark and John share a common source.
-
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2023 10:31 am
Re: Did John know Mark?
His diagram perfectly illustrates the fundamental theorem of NT studies: any problem in NT studies can be solved by postulating another lost gospel.
IMHO, the synoptic problem can be solved by just the gospels we know about: Mk --> Ev --> Lk --> Mt plus the inevitable harmonization which is going happen upon recopying manuscripts.
Re: Did John know Mark?
None of the 2SH or 2GH hypotheses reduced to canonical texts works correctly. Klinghardt doesn't work properly either. Of course, multisource makes no sense, but it works. That is why I claim that the gospels were written at one table at the same time
-
- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 2:10 am
Re: Did John know Mark?
CORRECTION
The "summary of my report" to SBL
is from JTS box 13 folder 10.
The later unpublished "Evidence and Arguments" text
is from JTS box 10 folder1.
The "summary of my report" to SBL
is from JTS box 13 folder 10.
The later unpublished "Evidence and Arguments" text
is from JTS box 10 folder1.