The meaning of 'thunderstruck' or 'astonished' must be what connects the epithet 'sons of thunder' to rgš or 'perception,' 'sense.'A.thunder, Διὸς μεγάλοιο κεραυνὸν δεινήν τε β. Il.21.199; “ὑπὸ βροντῆς πατρὸς Διός” 13.796; “Ζηνός τε βροντῇ” Od.20.121; ἀστραπὴ καὶ β. Hdt.3.86; “β. στεροπῇ τε” A.Supp.34 (anap.); “β. καὶ κεραυνίᾳ φλογί” Id.Pr.1017; βροντῆς μύκημα ib.1062 (anap.), cf. 1083 (anap.); “β. δ᾽ ἐρράγη δι᾽ ἀστραπῆς” S.Fr.578, etc.: in pl., Id.OC1514, X.HG1.6.28, Thphr. Sign.21, etc.; χθόνιαι β. Ar.Av.1745: metaph., “τούτου τὰς β. οἶδ᾽ ὅτι δείσεις” Lib.Ep.98.4.
II. the state of one struck with thunder, astonishment, ἐπεάν σφι θεὸς ἐμβάλῃ β. Hdt.7.10.έ. (βρομτα_, cf. βρέμω.)
Sons of Thunder --- James and John in gMark
-
- Posts: 3009
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:59 pm
Re: Sons of Thunder --- James and John in gMark
As I already shows the idea must go back to the secondary meaning of βροντή - astonishment:
Re: Sons of Thunder --- James and John in gMark
That was kind of the point of the "Busy Lowing" explanation for Boanerges, which leaves something like "windbags" for the alleged "sons of thunder". Lots of noise about nothing, as they don't understand anything.
-
- Posts: 3009
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:59 pm
Re: Sons of Thunder --- James and John in gMark
But is it believable that when Mark references them IN GREEK as 'the sons of thunder' - Jesus consecrating or choosing them - that he was referencing the term disparagingly? Strange time to go negative. If the name comes up when they were acting like 'windbags' it would make more sense, no? The same applies to Simon being called petros and the rest.
-
- Posts: 3009
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:59 pm
Re: Sons of Thunder --- James and John in gMark
And the ambiguity in Mark is curious too. How can the defining epithet of these guys be so (a) poorly explained and (b) so incomprehensible when an explanation is offered? The Old Syriac omits part of it. It is hard to explain.
Re: Sons of Thunder --- James and John in gMark
I'm not sure whether Mark shows much ambiguity. Does he have anything nice to say about the lot?
Last edited by Ulan on Tue Mar 31, 2015 9:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3009
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:59 pm
Re: Sons of Thunder --- James and John in gMark
I mean, it's certainly possible that there was a negative association with the term. Perhaps that explains the ambiguity.
Re: Sons of Thunder --- James and John in gMark
Continued in a new thread --- "Sons of Thunder --- Conclusions" --- at this link ---
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1425
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1425