Ben C. Smith wrote:[DCH,] Your definition of eis needs to go in the accusative column. (I have not verified the entire table; that one just stuck out for me.)
To be honest, I no longer remember where it came from. Probably class notes where I (horrors!) erred, writing it was used with the Ablative instead of the Accusative.
6 And John was clothed with camel`s hair, and [had] a leathern girdle about his loins, and did eat locusts and wild honey.
John is in the wilderness with no significant physical possessions except camel. In contrast, his spiritual message of getting into the spiritual kingdom is highly (so to speak) significant.