"King Paul"

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Secret Alias
Posts: 18922
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: "King Paul"

Post by Secret Alias »

And if the 'polemarch' was Marcus Agrippa then the corruption of פולומרכא into 'Paulos' because all the more understandable given the personal name of the king.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Secret Alias
Posts: 18922
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: "King Paul"

Post by Secret Alias »

The historical situation would presume:

1. a pre-existent Christian community presumably associated with 'Simon' (either 'Peter' or 'Magus' or the two being one and the same)
2. a period where Christianity was associated with rebels/brigands
3. a period where the authorities/the polemarch persecuted the rebels/brigands
4. a period (the Jewish War of 66 - 72 CE) where the 'polemarch' 'converted' to the religion and effectively took it over/Platonized it.
5. the continued existence of 'rebel Christians' persecuted by Vespasian and his sons (Eusebius) is a vestige of the earlier tradition.
6. the polemarch was responsible for pacifying the religion and identifying Jesus as a God.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Post Reply