Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Is it possible to understand the beginning of Christianity without accepting the existence of a man as the "mustard seed" of the process of formation?
There are people trying to explain the beginning of Christianity as the mythical transplant of some god on to earth , an explanation attributed to Euhemerus, but even the greatest intelligence and expertise of a mighty biblical scholar has failed to explain much.
I prefer a religion based on a reformer of an already existing religion, who was perceived to offer a desirable change to some people, and whose basic ideas were developed into a new system by later generations. Or something along these lines.
The mania about interpolations, frauds, offending verses etc indicate the process of formation; those are amendments modifying the founding constitution of a new state.
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:38 pm
Return to Christian Texts and History
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bernard Muller, Google [Bot], JoeWallack, Michael BG, MrMacSon, Steven Avery, Tod Stites, Yahoo [Bot] and 45 guests