Page 5 of 5
Re: Acts and the epistles (both Pauline and Catholic).
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2020 2:29 pm
by Ben C. Smith
John2 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 12, 2020 1:40 pmI'm inclined nowadays to see the Catholic epistles as being "Nazarene," i.e., as genuine letters of the Nazarene leaders James, Peter and John, and that the author of Acts was thus a Nazarene or pro-Nazarene and that Acts serves as a record of the Nazarene position (pro-Jewish Torah observance and acceptance of Paul).
Are Nazarenes the same as Nazoraeans, in your view? (The gospel of Luke seems to have only one or two instances of the former, depending on how the textual variants fall, while the book of Acts has none.)
In other words, I think the author of Acts used the letters of Paul and others because that's what Nazarenes did.
Is this a departure from an earlier position of yours? I seem to recall you suggesting at one point that the Nazarenes did
not use Paul. (It is perfectly fine if so; just checking.)
Re: Acts and the epistles (both Pauline and Catholic).
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2020 2:54 pm
by John2
Ben C. Smith wrote: ↑Sat Sep 12, 2020 2:29 pm
John2 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 12, 2020 1:40 pmI'm inclined nowadays to see the Catholic epistles as being "Nazarene," i.e., as genuine letters of the Nazarene leaders James, Peter and John, and that the author of Acts was thus a Nazarene or pro-Nazarene and that Acts serves as a record of the Nazarene position (pro-Jewish Torah observance and acceptance of Paul).
Are Nazarenes the same as Nazoraeans, in your view? (The gospel of Luke seems to have only one or two instances of the former, depending on how the textual variants fall, while the book of Acts has none.)
Yes. I just prefer to say "Nazarene" because it's easier to type.
In other words, I think the author of Acts used the letters of Paul and others because that's what Nazarenes did.
Is this a departure from an earlier position of yours? I seem to recall you suggesting at one point that the Nazarenes did
not use Paul. (It is perfectly fine if so; just checking.)
I used to see "Jewish Christians" in general as being opposed to Paul, and Acts as being proto-orthodox (i.e., Pauline), but now I think there were two kinds of Jewish Christians, those who came to be called Nazarenes/Nazoraeans (who accepted Paul) and those who came to be called Ebionites (who did not). And I think both factions are represented in Acts (as proto-Nazarenes and proto-Ebionites) and that the author sides with the (proto-) Nazarenes.