MrMacSon wrote:Giuseppe wrote:You are making my argument.
Some wrote the first of these Gospels:
The 4 Canonical Gospels.
And the reaction he/she triggered was precisely that:
- 50-90 The Signs Gospel. [???]
50-140 The Gospel of Thomas.
80-150 The Gospel of the Hebrews.
70-160 The Gospel of Peter.
80-150 The Gospel of the Egyptians.
100-160 The Gospel of the Ebionites.
100-160 The Gospel of the Nazoreans.
110-160 The Traditions of Matthias.
120-140 The Gospel of Basilides.
120-180 The Gospel of Mary.
130-170 The Gospel of Judas.
140-170 The Infancy Gospel of James (Proto-Evangelium).
140-180 The Gospel of Truth.
The Gospel of Valentinus according to Irenaeus, was the same as the "Gospel of Truth".
150-255 The Gospel of Nicodemus (Acta Pilati).
180-250 The Gospel of Philip.
and also :
- 100-150 The Gospel of the Twelve Apostles.
The Gospel of Marcion.
The Gospel of Eve.
The writing Genna Marias.
The Gospel Teleioseos.
Second Treatise of the Great Seth.
If that reaction is not evidence of
SURPRISE in front of the
first gospel, then what would it be?
It is possible that the so-called apocryphal gospels are
not 'reactions' to the Canonical gospels: there are a number of possible scenarios such as different communities develop or editing gospels concurrently, subsequently, or independently; or a combination of these.
I don't mean that. My view is that the reaction after the reading of the
first Gospel - the reaction by
learned Christian people who could read, therefore the reaction from
high society - was a reaction of
SURPRISE and the evidence is the creation on the table of 10000 gospels
all based, more or less, on the first Gospel.
Remember that 90 % of the population (Christians or Pagans) could not read.
Their first immediate reaction was "listen !".
It's not expected a so
passive reaction (the mere ''listen!'') behind the creation, in reply to the
first Gospel, of 10000 Gospels all based on the first Gospel. Therefore I refer to the principal reaction of the learned Christians, their leaders, their
insiders. Not to the passive
hoi polloi.
When an insider of a community
x did read the first Gospel, he was
surprised by it, he wrote his own Gospel and did reveal it to his
outsiders.
All that was made in few years, maybe months, maybe even days. There was
not opposition at all to the idea that Jesus came down on Terra firma, because all Christians did accept that idea in very few days, since the
new message relative to that new idea was a message of
SURPRISE. And all were
really surprised.
The
surprise was the precise goal of the first evangelist. Because the
essentia of the Gospel Jesus, shared by
all the our Gospel Jesus
es, is the dramatic contrast between:
1) the old and the new
2) the expected and the unexpected
3) the 'historical' and the mythical
4) the traditional and the revolutionary
5) the boring and the surprising
6) the known and the unknown
7) the prophetized and the un-prophetized
8) the material and the spiritual
In other terms, the reaction of Iraeneus, Justin, Tertullian, Basilides, Carpocrates, Valentinus and other learned heretics and/or proto-catholics when they listened for the first time the first Gospel:
Mcn.