How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospels

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
iskander
Posts: 2091
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:38 pm

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by iskander »

Who is so stupid and naive to believe?

Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter 11)

8. It is not possible that the Gospels can be either more or fewer in number than they are. For, since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds,
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103311.htm
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by Secret Alias »

Who determined that four is the right number?
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by Secret Alias »

Admittedly at one time the Torah was only four books but that's not the point. The obviously correct answer, the natural assumption would be one book, one author, one message, one god, n'est-ce pas? Four is strange and comes from a later period. One wouldn't expect the original position to be 'four books = the gospel.' It comes from a late period and after differences between the four texts (divorced from four separate traditions presumably) were smoothed over.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
TedM
Posts: 855
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:25 am

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by TedM »

Secret Alias wrote:Why is it so hard for people to believe that massive rewriting of the holy writings of the Christians took place. The pagans said it happened (Celsus),
Can someone provide a link for this please?
iskander
Posts: 2091
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:38 pm

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by iskander »

iskander wrote:Who is so stupid and naive to believe?

Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter 11)

8. It is not possible that the Gospels can be either more or fewer in number than they are. For, since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds,
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103311.htm
, while the Church is scattered throughout all the world, and the pillar and ground 1 Timothy 3:15 of the Church is the Gospel and the spirit of life; it is fitting that she should have four pillars,
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103311.htm
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by Secret Alias »

And? How does this prove anything? If I told you I was a billionaire you'd believe it?
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by Secret Alias »

2.27 After this he says, that certain of the Christian believers, like persons who in a fit of drunkenness lay violent hands upon themselves, have corrupted the Gospel from its original integrity, to a threefold, and fourfold, and many-fold degree, and have remodelled it, so that they might be able to answer objections.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
iskander
Posts: 2091
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:38 pm

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by iskander »

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103311.htm

. From which fact, it is evident that the Word, the Artificer of all, He that sits upon the cherubim, and contains all things, He who was manifested to men, has given us the Gospel under four aspects, but bound together by one Spirit. As also David says, when entreating His manifestation, You that sits between the cherubim, shine forth. For the cherubim, too, were four-faced, and their faces were images of the dispensation of the Son of God. For, [as the Scripture] says, The first living creature was like a lion, Revelation 4:7 symbolizing His effectual working, His leadership, and royal power; the second [living creature] was like a calf, signifying [His] sacrificial and sacerdotal order; but the third had, as it were, the face as of a man,— an evident description of His advent as a human being; the fourth was like a flying eagle, pointing out the gift of the Spirit hovering with His wings over the Church. And therefore the Gospels are in accord with these things, among which Christ Jesus is seated.
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by Secret Alias »

A Jewish Christian source cited by Al Jabbar
the Romans reigned over them. The Christians (used to) complain to the Romans about the Jews, showed them their own weakness and appealed to their pity. And the Romans did pity them. This (used) to happen frequently. And the Romans said to the Christians: "Between us and the Jews there is a pact which (obliges us) not to change their religious laws. But if you would abandon their laws and separate yourselves from them, praying as we do (while facing) the East, eating (the things) we eat, and regarding as permissible that which we consider as such, we should help you and make you powerful, and the Jews would find no way (to harm you). On the contrary, you would be more powerful than they."

The Christians answered: "We will do this." (And the Romans) said: "Go, fetch your companions, and bring your Book." (The Christians) went to their companions, informed them of (what had taken place) between them and the Romans and said to them: "Bring the Gospel, and stand up so that we should go to them."
The text goes on to describe how the Romans ultimately transformed the single gospel into a fourfold text. It also mentions ‘dissenters’ to this corruption process and the involvement of disreputable presbyters like Irenaeus:
But these said to them: "You have done ill. We are not permitted (to let) the Romans pollute the Gospel. In giving a favorable answer to the Romans, you have accordingly departed from the religion. We are (therefore) no longer permitted to associate with you; on the contrary, we are obliged to declare that there is nothing in common between us and you;" and they prevented their (taking possession of) the Gospel or gaining access to it. In consequence a violent quarrel (broke out) between (the two groups). Those (mentioned in the first place) went back to the Romans and said to them: "Help us against these companions of ours before (helping us) against the Jews, and take away from them on our behalf our Book." Thereupon (the companions of whom they had spoken) fled the country. And the Romans wrote concerning them to their governors in the districts of Mosul and in the Jazirat al-'Arab. Accordingly, a search was made for them; some were caught and burned, others were killed.

(As for) those who had given a favorable answer to the Romans they came together and took counsel as to how to replace the Gospel, seeing that it was lost to them. (Thus) the opinion that a Gospel should be composed was established among them. They said: "the Torah (consists) only of (narratives concerning) the births of the prophets and of the histories of their lives. We are going to construct a Gospel according to this (pattern).

Everyone among us is going to call to mind that which he remembers of the words of the Gospel and of (the things) about which the Christians talked among themselves (when speaking) of Christ." Accordingly … four Gospels were left which are due to four individuals.
Al Jabbar quotes his original source as concluding that:
If the Christians would consider these things, they would know that the Gospels which are with them are of no profit to them, and that the knowledge claimed (on their behalf) by their masters and the authors (of the Gospels) is not (found) in them, and that on this point) things are just as we have said---it is a well-known (fact) which is referred to here (namely the fact that they have abandoned the religion of Christ and turned towards) the religious doctrines of the Romans, prizing and (seeking to obtain) in haste the profits which could be derived from their domination and their riches.'
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
iskander
Posts: 2091
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:38 pm

Re: How the evangelists understood the nature of their gospe

Post by iskander »

For Marcion, rejecting the entire Gospel, yea rather, cutting himself off from the Gospel, boasts that he has part in the [blessings of] the Gospel
Post Reply