Assumed that in Mark the identity of Jesus is hidden again and again, what is the evidence of the Secret in Mark being really a MESSIANIC
Only the incipit ?
Only the fact that Mark is pauline, and Paul called ''Christ'' his Jesus ?
Only the Peter's confession?
I put this question because of:1)
the apparent contradiction between Mark 13:6 (''I am'') and Mark 14:62 (''I am'').2)
the words of Pilate in 15:12 ('...'who you call the king of Jews'') make me to think that Pilate is describing - as a pure simple fact - what the scribes and pharisees thought really (that Jesus was the ''king of the Jews''). 3)
the fact that Jesus rejected Peter as ''Satan'' just after the Peter's confession that Jesus is the Christ. 4)
under the cross and even as titulum crucis
, Jesus is called ''king of Jews'', but apparently this is simply the view of him according to his enemies. 5)
the demons, who know Jesus, never call him ''Christ''.