I have taken page 2 of that document and re-ordered the references chronologically here: -
Carrier's "New Essential Bibliography" re-ordered chronologically
G.J. Goldberg. 1995. “The Coincidences of the Testimonium of Josephus and the Emmaus Narrative of Luke.” Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 13: 59–77.
Ken Olson. 1999. “Eusebius and the Testimonium Flavianum.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 61:305–22.
Alice Whealey. 2008. “The Testimonium Flavianum in Syriac and Arabic.” New TestamentStudies 54.4: 573–90.
Louis Feldman. 2012. “On the Authenticity of the ‘Testimonium Flavianum’ Attributed toJosephus.”
in New Perspectives on Jewish Christian Relations, eds. E Carlebach & J Schacter (Brill), pp. 13–30.
Richard Carrier. 2012. “Origen, Eusebius, and the Accidental Interpolation in Josephus, Jewish Antiquities 20.200.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 20.4: 489–514
[Reproduced in 'Hitler Homer Bible Christ: The Historical Papers of Richard Carrier' 1995-2013 (Philosophy Press, 2014), pp. 337–68.]
Ken Olson. 2013. “A Eusebian Reading of the Testimonium Flavianum.” in Eusebius of Caesarea:Tradition and Innovations, eds. A Johnson & J Schott (Harvard University Press), pp. 97–114.
Paul Hopper. 2014. “A Narrative Anomaly in Josephus: Jewish Antiquities xviii:63.”
in Linguistics and Literary Studies: Interfaces, Encounters, Transfers, eds. M Fludernik & D Jacob (de Gruyter), pp. 147–169.
Richard Carrier. 2014. “Josephus and the Testimonia Flaviana.” in On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt (Sheffield-Phoenix), pp. 332–342.
Alice Whealey. 2016. “The Testimonium Flavianum.” A Companion to Josephus in His World, eds. HHChapman Z Rodgers (John Wiley & Sons), pp. 345–55.
[Which fails to take into account any of the [above] (except Whealey 2008 and Olson 1999), which is reflective of the problem that needs correcting.]
Last edited by MrMacSon on Fri Aug 03, 2018 1:05 am, edited 3 times in total.
There is no reference to Feldman 2012; Olson; or Hopper.
Feldman is noted (up to 2000 anyway) in Price's bibliography.
Feldman, Louis H., "The Testimonium Flavianum: The State of the Question," Christological Perspectives, Eds. Robert F. Berkley and Sarah Edwards, New York, 1982
Feldman, Louis H. Josephus and Modern Scholarship New York, 1984
John2 wrote:
Feldman is noted (up to 2000 anyway) in Price's bibliography.
As Neil Godfrey has recently noted in another thread, Feldman has markedly changed his position [from before 2000 to recently].
Louis Feldman. 2012. “On the Authenticity of the ‘Testimonium Flavianum’ Attributed toJosephus.”
in New Perspectives on Jewish Christian Relations, eds. E Carlebach & J Schacter (Brill), pp. 13–30.
“In conclusion, there is reason to think that a Christian such as Eusebius would have sought to portray Josephus as more favorably disposed toward Jesus and may well have interpolated such a statement as that which is found in the Testimonium Flavianum.” (p. 28)
John2 wrote:
... Olson is mentioned there too in Price's response to him.
Olson's more substantive commentary is
Ken Olson. 2013. “A Eusebian Reading of the Testimonium Flavianum.” in Eusebius of Caesarea:Tradition and Innovations, eds. A Johnson & J Schott (Harvard University Press), pp. 97–114.
Ben sent me a link to an article he wrote regarding Goldberg, Carlson, Tacitus and the TF (which Ben says he no longer agrees with, but I think it's worth putting up here for consideration).