Full Commentary on Reza Aslan's "Zealot" (2013)

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
User avatar
spin
Posts: 2157
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:44 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Full Commentary on Reza Aslan's "Zealot" (2013)

Post by spin »

Blood wrote:Romans soldiers spoke in Latin, not Greek.
Which Roman soldiers spoke Latin? Most soldiers were conscripted in the empire, not Rome, so they did not speak Latin. If they came from the eastern Mediterranean they probably did speak Greek. Most Romans of any stature learned Greek, so one should be able to assume that at least the officers spoke Greek.
Dysexlia lures • ⅔ of what we see is behind our eyes
User avatar
Blood
Posts: 899
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:03 am

Re: Full Commentary on Reza Aslan's "Zealot" (2013)

Post by Blood »

Azlan stated that lestai was "the most common Roman designation for an insurrectionist or rebel."

He is just copying this term from Josephus and assuming Roman soldiers used the same term.

And by "the Romans," he is strongly implying ethnic Italians, not all the different ethnicities in the Roman legions.
“The only sensible response to fragmented, slowly but randomly accruing evidence is radical open-mindedness. A single, simple explanation for a historical event is generally a failure of imagination, not a triumph of induction.” William H.C. Propp
Post Reply