ARGUMENT FROM ONE WAY LOGIC/RELEVANCYEven though it existed, this is not the place someone would make up as the hometown of the messiah. Jesus really came from there, as attested in multiple sources.
But again I reiterate the main point of my chapter. Even if he did not come from there, so what? The historicity of Jesus does not depend on whether Nazareth existed. In fact it is not even related to the question. The existence (or rather, non-existence) of Nazareth is another mythicist irrelevancy.
1. When Jesus lived is irrelevant (so you can ignore contradictory evidence).
2. Nazareth existed when Jesus lived.
3. Where Nazareth was located is irrelevant (so you can ignore contradictory evidence).
4. Credibility of anonymous witnesses is irrelevant (so you can ignore criteria of credibility and dependence).
5. Multiple witnesses say Jesus came from Nazareth.
6. That Nazareth was known for having tombs would have the stylish contrivance of Jesus coming from the tombs
at the start at end of GMark is irrelevant.
7. Transmission of the evidence is irrelevant.
8. Therefore, Jesus existed.