Page 5 of 5

Re: Mummy Mask Manuscript Might Mean More Metaphorical Mark?

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 2:12 am
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
lsayre wrote:When will the text of 'Mark on a Mask' be published? Has any of it been published yet?
It was claimed first that it would be published in 2013 by Brill, than in 2015, than in 2017

Re: Mummy Mask Manuscript Might Mean More Metaphorical Mark?

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:19 am
by Ben C. Smith
Kunigunde Kreuzerin wrote:
lsayre wrote:When will the text of 'Mark on a Mask' be published? Has any of it been published yet?
It was claimed first that it would be published in 2013 by Brill, than in 2015, than in 2017
It has been beaucoup frustrating.

Re: Mummy Mask Manuscript Might Mean More Metaphorical Mark?

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:02 am
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Ben C. Smith wrote:
Kunigunde Kreuzerin wrote:
lsayre wrote:When will the text of 'Mark on a Mask' be published? Has any of it been published yet?
It was claimed first that it would be published in 2013 by Brill, than in 2015, than in 2017
It has been beaucoup frustrating.
So far I know the situation is also a bit strange. Daniel B. Wallace and Craig Evans spoke about the ms to a wider audience and to the media. But both said that they never saw personally the papyrus. Only Scott Carroll (former director of the Green collection) and Josh McDowell claimed that, but they did not speak officially to the media. The owner of the ms and the research group seems to be rather unknown. It was claimed that Dirk Obbink was one of the experts.

Re: Mummy Mask Manuscript Might Mean More Metaphorical Mark?

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:50 am
by davidbrainerd
Kunigunde Kreuzerin wrote:
lsayre wrote:When will the text of 'Mark on a Mask' be published? Has any of it been published yet?
It was claimed first that it would be published in 2013 by Brill, than in 2015, than in 2017
Maybe they found out its not as easy to forge as they thought it would be.

Re: Mummy Mask Manuscript Might Mean More Metaphorical Mark?

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:27 pm
by DCHindley
It has dawned on me that Peter Kirby cannot be a Californian, but an Australian, as the initial letters of the title of this thread are MMMMMMMM, or expressed in mathematical terms M8, "mate!" :facepalm:

DCH

Re: Mummy Mask Manuscript Might Mean More Metaphorical Mark?

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:43 pm
by Ben C. Smith
DCHindley wrote:It has dawned on me that Peter Kirby cannot be a Californian, but an Australian, as the initial letters of the title of this thread are MMMMMMMM, or expressed in mathematical terms M8, "mate!" :facepalm:
Egads, do you have too much time on your hands or what, David? :D

Re: Mummy Mask Manuscript Might Mean More Metaphorical Mark?

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:11 am
by DCHindley
Ben C. Smith wrote:
DCHindley wrote:It has dawned on me that Peter Kirby cannot be a Californian, but an Australian, as the initial letters of the title of this thread are MMMMMMMM, or expressed in mathematical terms M8, "mate!" :facepalm:
Egads, do you have too much time on your hands or what, David? :D
Tough week and a need to decompress ... through humor. :cheeky: It is also my "clever" parody of "super-nit-picky-ism" and "over-jumping-to-conclusion-ism."