There was a time when dogmatic theology, with its endless complexities and metaphysical subtleties, as yet was not.Secret Alias wrote:Erasmus had used the expression 'totius Christi fabulae' in Methodus lb v 91c/Holborn 209, but had been attacked by Bede for his use of it in his paraphrase on Mark 11:7, where he says of the details of the entry into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday: 'The apostles played a supporting role in this act [fabula], even though they did not understand its meaning' (lb vii 243b/cwe 49 136). Erasmus' use of fabula and his exchange with B ́eda are discussed by Peter G. Bietenholz Historia and Fabula: Myths and Legends in Historical Thought from Antiquity to the Modern Age (Leiden 1994) 147–8; Georges Chantraine 'Mystere' et 'Philosophie de Christ' selon Erasme Bibliotheque de la faculte de philosophie et lettres de namur 49 (Gembloux 1971) 274–95 discusses Erasmus' use of the expression 'Christi Fabula.' In 1512 a heretic named Herman Ruissvich was burned to death in The Hague after being found guilty by an inquisitor of returning to various erroneous opinions and scandalous actions he had abjured in 1499, among which was that 'he traduced the Christian Faith as a fabula, and similarly the books of the Old Testament and Gospel of the New Law'; see Duplessy Collectio judiciorum i-2 342. By using the term fabula Erasmus was opening himself to misunderstanding. https://books.google.com/books?id=SvGbi ... 22&f=false
Paul writes in his letters to Timothy, the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned. Those who indulged in these vain jangling he denounces as men desiring to be teachers of the law, understanding neither what they say nor from where they affirm and he commands , but foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they engender strife .Paul is warning against a continuing revelation and against an infallible man engendering strife.
Which were the foolish questions that eventually gave life to the Holy Inquisition?