Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
For example, I see Hurtado who insists that, even if the Gospels used a lot of Pagan tropoi (per Litwa and Richard Miller's studies), the essential for him (as historical and as believer, I think) is that the essence of the earliest Christian spirituality is Jewish and this "someway" confirms that Jesus is historical.
I confess my embarrassment about this conclusion. Is Carrier right when he wants to prove that, even if interpreted as 100% Jewish, Jesus may be mythical in a plausible way, or the Reductio ad Judaeum (to see the Origins as only Jewish) is basically an implicit apologetical tactic so accepted that Carrier himself has to use it?
I confess my embarrassment about this conclusion. Is Carrier right when he wants to prove that, even if interpreted as 100% Jewish, Jesus may be mythical in a plausible way, or the Reductio ad Judaeum (to see the Origins as only Jewish) is basically an implicit apologetical tactic so accepted that Carrier himself has to use it?
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
The character Jesus is Jewish in Luke's . Nothing can change this. Not believing would not change that.
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
But if proto-Luke is marcionite, then even you should see the Lukan Jesus (so lacking of passions) as a gentile Jesus. At any case, I am talking about the spirituality of Peter (if we agree that Peter was the real founder of the cult). That the Gospels are full of gentile tropoi doesn't matter here.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
" Lacking of passions " ??
If I could understand this pretentious nothing, I would try to find a considered reply.
Bye
If I could understand this pretentious nothing, I would try to find a considered reply.
Bye
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
(David Fitzgerald, Nailed)Luke's Jesus is as imperturbable as a
Japanese geisha
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
- neilgodfrey
- Posts: 6161
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
Deep. Your argument nearly wet my ankles.
vridar.org Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
What evidence then?, pisser.
-
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:19 am
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
Philippians 3:
2 Beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers, beware of those who mutilate the flesh!
The metric to judge if one is a good exegete: the way he/she deals with Barabbas.
Who disagrees with me on this precise point is by definition an idiot.-Giuseppe
Who disagrees with me on this precise point is by definition an idiot.-Giuseppe
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
Yes , Christianity became a gentile religion, eventually.perseusomega9 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2017 10:01 amPhilippians 3:
2 Beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers, beware of those who mutilate the flesh!
-
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:19 am
Re: Is Prof Price against the Reductio ad Judaeum?
Where eventually <= 30 years?
The metric to judge if one is a good exegete: the way he/she deals with Barabbas.
Who disagrees with me on this precise point is by definition an idiot.-Giuseppe
Who disagrees with me on this precise point is by definition an idiot.-Giuseppe