This possibility opens a new view of the comparison Jesus versus Caesar. Remember what Richard Miller said about the Gospels as subversive, but not seditious narratives, in relation to the Roman world. Remember even the insistence of the our dogmatic historicist outhouse on the anti-imperial meaning of words as "gospel" or "kyrios" or "son of god"...One reason for fixing the birth in the reign of Augustus probably was that August himself was regarded as a saviour-god by the Roman world. And his reign was the commencement of a new era, much better, it was hoped, than the immediately preceding one.
Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
So Rylands in Did Jesus ever live?, p. 111:
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
-
- Posts: 18362
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
But at some point these 'revisionist' theories have to decide whether the gospel and Christianity were directed against the Jews or against the Romans - it can't be both if it understood to have been produced as a reaction or in relation to Jewish revolutionary activity.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Re: Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
Why can't it be both (against "possessed-by-demons" pagans and against "blind" Jews)?Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:23 am But at some point these 'revisionist' theories have to decide whether the gospel and Christianity were directed against the Jews or against the Romans - it can't be both if it understood to have been produced as a reaction or in relation to Jewish revolutionary activity.
I think that the Christians were very similar to modern preachers of "Holy War" against all and all.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:37 pm
Re: Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
It can be against both, just like your buddies taking down confederate statues also torched the face of a bust of the great emancipator.Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:23 am But at some point these 'revisionist' theories have to decide whether the gospel and Christianity were directed against the Jews or against the Romans - it can't be both if it understood to have been produced as a reaction or in relation to Jewish revolutionary activity.
-
- Posts: 18362
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
Ignoring the fact that America is one of the only civilized countries in which racist has long recent history of acceptability, where everything is ultimately about race, it is interesting to look again at the ancient situation. If the gospel was produced c 70 CE as I believe and most people believe it seems hard to understand how the text could have been against Jews and Romans. Who was it 'for'? I am not able to of see 'many sides' with respect to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE. Either you were 'for' it or 'against' it. 'For' the Roman reconquest or 'against' it.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
-
- Posts: 18362
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
Who then was it 'for'? Who was the author writing for? Are you supposing that the author invented an audience that wasn't there before the text was written? Unlikely.against "possessed-by-demons" pagans and against "blind" Jews
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Re: Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
Note that Jesus does exorcisms only in Galilee while he heals only blind people in Judaea. The exorcisms are against Pagan idols while the blindness is only of the Jews, guilty for not having seen the Messiah. The author could be a Marcionite or whoever you like: this didn't prevent him from hating both - Jews and Gentiles - for their different rejection of the Christ.Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:49 amWho then was it 'for'? Who was the author writing for? Are you supposing that the author invented an audience that wasn't there before the text was written? Unlikely.against "possessed-by-demons" pagans and against "blind" Jews
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
-
- Posts: 18362
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
I am not against the idea of the Jews being portrayed as blind. I am saying that it would be highly unusual for the author to have sidestepped taking sides given the recentness of Rome vs the Jews. I can't see how it isn't 'either/or.' It's either Pilate was exonerated by Mark BECAUSE he was pro-Roman or somehow you have to fit that into a pro-Jewish narrative.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Re: Why Pilate? Because of Augustus
According to Rylands, the earliest Gospel had the crucifixion in Galilee by Herod. After the crucifixion was placed in Jerusalem and done by Pilate. According to this view, Pilate entered on the stage not in virtue of an anti-Judaism, but as apology pro-Jews and anti-gentile.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.