Page 1 of 1
Is Jesus's "getting angry" in Papyrus Egerton 2 the same greek word "ὀργισθεὶς" as the textual variant of Mark 1:41?
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 12:28 pm
by toejam
Mark 1:41 contains an infamous textual variant. Jesus's response to a leper's begging to be healed is described in some manuscripts as σπλαγχνισθεὶς (being moved with compassion), and in other manuscripts as ὀργισθεὶς (becoming angry).
I'm looking at English translations of Papyrus Egerton 2's scene where Jesus is asked about paying taxes and it also describes Jesus as "becoming angry". I can't find a greek text of the fragment however. Does anyone know, does Papyrus Egerton 2 use the same word ὀργισθεὶς as in the Markan textual variant?
Re: Is Jesus's "getting angry" in Papyrus Egerton 2 the same greek word "ὀργισθεὶς" as the textual variant of Mark 1:41?
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:09 pm
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
.
Perhaps you mean this
verse?
Ben C. Smith wrote: ↑Thu Sep 24, 2015 6:29 pm
Egerton Gospel
Information
...
Fragment 2 Recto 1 [................ παραγε-]
9 τοις ἢ μ̣[ή;] ὁ δὲ Ἰη(σοῦς) εἰδὼς [τὴν δι-]
10 άνοιαν [αὐτ]ῶν ἐμβρειμ[ησάμενος]
11 εἴπεν α[ὐτοῖς·] τί με καλεῖτ[ε τῷ στό-] |
Fragment 2 Recto 1 [................ having ar-]
9 (it) to | em or n[ot?] But Je(sus) knew [the]ir
10 [m]ind and became enrag[ed] and
11 said [to] t[hem,] "Why do yo[ú] call me [te]acher[/td] |
|---|
Re: Is Jesus's "getting angry" in Papyrus Egerton 2 the same greek word "ὀργισθεὶς" as the textual variant of Mark 1:41?
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:11 pm
by toejam
So that's a NO then...
Re: Is Jesus's "getting angry" in Papyrus Egerton 2 the same greek word "ὀργισθεὶς" as the textual variant of Mark 1:41?
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:22 pm
by Ben C. Smith
Kunigunde Kreuzerin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:09 pm
.
Perhaps you mean this
verse?
Ben C. Smith wrote: ↑Thu Sep 24, 2015 6:29 pm
Egerton Gospel
Information
...
Fragment 2 Recto 1 [................ παραγε-]
9 τοις ἢ μ̣[ή;] ὁ δὲ Ἰη(σοῦς) εἰδὼς [τὴν δι-]
10 άνοιαν [αὐτ]ῶν ἐμβρειμ[ησάμενος]
11 εἴπεν α[ὐτοῖς·] τί με καλεῖτ[ε τῷ στό-] |
Fragment 2 Recto 1 [................ having ar-]
9 (it) to | em or n[ot?] But Je(sus) knew [the]ir
10 [m]ind and became enrag[ed] and
11 said [to] t[hem,] "Why do yo[ú] call me [te]acher[/td] |
|---|
Sorry for the awful formatting there, Kunigunde. The recent changes to the forum activated some codes that were not in effect before, making nonsense of some of my tables. I have fixed that page, and quite a few others; if you find any more of my pages with weird formatting like that, please feel free to let me know. The changes are quick and easy.