Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Secret Alias »

As such Jastrow's reconstruction is complete nonsense. The idea seems to be that the priest was hit with blocks of wood from within the tabernacle.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
iskander
Posts: 2091
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:38 pm

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by iskander »

This translation :
Sanhedrin 81b
MISHNAH. IF ONE STEALS THE KISWAH,23 OR CURSES BY ENCHANTMENT, OR
COHABITS WITH A HEATHEN [LIT. SYRIAN] WOMAN, HE IS PUNISHED BY ZEALOTS.24IF A PRIEST PERFORMED THE TEMPLE SERVICE WHILST UNCLEAN, HIS BROTHER PRIESTS DO NOT CHARGE HIM THEREWITH AT BETH DIN, BUT THE YOUNG PRIESTS TAKE HIM OUT OF THE TEMPLE COURT AND SPLIT HIS SKULL WITH CLUBS.
A LAYMAN WHO PERFORMED THE SERVICE IN THE TEMPLE, R. AKIBA SAID: HE IS STRANGLED; THE SAGES SAY: [HIS DEATH IS] AT THE HANDS OF HEAVEN.
https://halakhah.com/pdf/nezikin/Sanhedrin.pdf

OR this other one .Attachment)
sanhedrin 81b.PNG
sanhedrin 81b.PNG (88.29 KiB) Viewed 6532 times

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.81b?lang=bi
Last edited by iskander on Thu Nov 23, 2017 4:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Secret Alias »

And the passage in Hegesippus is pretty specific:
And one of them, who was a fuller, took the club with which he beat out clothes and struck the just man on the head.
Let's look at the two passages. In the story of James fullers come and take the sticks that they used to beat skins and hit James. In the Mishnah the priests took blocks of wood morning and afternoon to the fire for the sacrifices and apparently were to beat or beat a bad priest with these. No connection.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Secret Alias »

According to Sokoloff there is a word for 'fuller's club' in Aramaic - מדרתא
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Secret Alias »

I think the priests were whipped with pieces of wood rather than clubbed. https://www.sefaria.org/Yoma.23a?lang=bi The bad priest is whipped with פקיע http://cal.huc.edu/showjastrow.php?page=1209 which is strips of wood or faggots which are put on the fire of the temple.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Nathan
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2016 5:30 pm

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Nathan »

Secret Alias wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:30 pm Yes Jastrow does have club but I still want to see other passages which have this meaning. I think it is a perplexing passage. Yoma has branches. I don't see another example of club. Jastrow's only example of 'clubs' is this passage as far as I can see. I think Numbers 25 is the precedent.
Jastrow lists several additional examples for "club(s)," including Tosefta Kelim Baba Qamma 1.6, Bavli Taanit 18b, and Kohelet Rabba 3.17.

FWIW Neusner's Tosefta translation has "clubs," the Artscroll Bavli Taanit translation has "clubs," and the Soncino Kohelet Rabba translation has "clubs," as well. (I'm seeing a pattern here.)
Secret Alias wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:34 pm Sokoloff - a superior authority to Jastrow - doesn't have 'clubs.' https://books.google.com/books?id=rlYSW ... 22&f=false

גזר n.m. cut piece, decree (→ √גזר ) 1. cut piece: pl. גזרייא TN Gen 15:17 [H הגזרים ]; 2. in גזר דין decree: גזר דין נפק the decree was promulgated Git 46d(44); ib. 50c(32); San 18b(4); מחתם הוא גזר דינא the decree is sealed FTP Gen 6:3; Ber 5c(37); ib. 39
You cite Sokoloff's A Dictionary of Palestinian Jewish Aramaic, but recall that the text at the heart of this discussion (in Sanhedrin 81b) is written in Hebrew, not Aramaic. In other words, despite its seemingly Aramaic plural suffix, the word in question (gezirin) is actually Hebrew; hence its absence from Sokoloff's dictionary.

See e.g. Gesenius' Grammar (87.1a) for instances of this Aramaizing tendency found already in biblical Hebrew: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gesenius ... the_Plural.
Secret Alias wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:40 pm Nor is it in Tal - https://books.google.com/books?id=6K-9C ... ee&f=false
Samaritan Aramaic is not going to help here, either.
Secret Alias wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 5:32 pm According to Sokoloff there is a word for 'fuller's club' in Aramaic - מדרתא
Aramaic again. We're (supposed to be) talking rabbinic Hebrew. All of the examples given by Jastrow are in Hebrew.
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Secret Alias »

Yes obviously the Mishnah is written in a different language. But what evidence is there as to the meaning of the Hebrew term? The scholars all make educated guesses. Tal is not irrelevant to the discussion. Many Hebrew loanwords were absorbed by Aramaic as a result of this coexistence among Jewish and Samaritan communities. Tal considers this absorption of Hebrew an integral part of Samaritan Aramaic. Moreover we should expect that Jews and Samaritans at one time spoke a common Hebrew language. So where did this word enter Mishnaic Hebrew? Jastrow lists the verb gzr as being rooted in Biblical Hebrew but the noun is a mystery and like all mysteries the solution is rooted in mere guesswork.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Secret Alias »

Hmmm. The phrase from Taanit 18b ופצעו את מוחו בגיזרין
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Secret Alias
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Secret Alias »

It is unlikely that they would have whipped Trajan's skull with strips of wood. However historically Trajan fell ill and died of a stroke. It is odd that where the terminology appears it is always preserved in this form - as an expression.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Ulan
Posts: 1505
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:58 am

Re: Why Are Historicists So Certain That Jesus Existed?

Post by Ulan »

I must admit I don't know where you see the difference between a "cut piece of wood" and a club. In its base form, a club is a cut piece of wood swung as a weapon. You can make it more elaborate than that, but that isn't necessary.
Post Reply