(1 Corinthians 1:23)...but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles
(Mark 15:16-20)The soldiers led Jesus away into the palace (that is, the Praetorium) and called together the whole company of soldiers. They put a purple robe on him, then twisted together a crown of thorns and set it on him. And they began to call out to him, “Hail, king of the Jews!” Again and again they struck him on the head with a staff and spit on him. Falling on their knees, they paid homage to him. And when they had mocked him, they took off the purple robe and put his own clothes on him. Then they led him out to crucify him.
Clearly, prima facie, it seems that for ''Mark'' (author), the ''foolishness'' of the Christianity in the eyes of the gentiles is the 'fact' that Jesus was a crucified messianist in Judea.
It's not so for Paul, where the ''foolishness'' in the eyes of the Pagans is the fact that the Christians are preaching a celestial god-saviour crucified by demons in the sublunary realm.
Mark is believing really that the crucifixion of Jesus is a real historical event. Therefore, à la Euhemerus, he is giving the his ''reconstruction'' (really, a figment) of the 'facts'.
But I have another alternative theory.
Note the (apparently not-necessary) particular of the verse 20:
The mocking of Jesus lasted until its representation as a mock ''king of the Jews''. Some way, the fact that Jesus gains again his 'own clothes' is a clue to a new view of Jesus by the same soldiers.After mocking him, they stripped him of the purple cloak and put his own clothes on him.
Jesus becomes again invisible. Hence the explicit reference to an end of the his mocking.
The mocking occurs again when it is made explicit that the crucified is ''king of Jews'' with the titulum on the cross.
So there is a causal link between the recovery of his original ''clothes'' and the invisibility of Jesus. There is even the need of another person who bears the cross: Simon of Cyrene. A possible explanation is that Jesus is so invisible that another carrier (not Richard) is necessary. Jesus can be ''seen'' by outsiders only when he is represented and derided as a mock ''King of the Jews''. Otherwise, he is a perfect Mr. Unknown.
So maybe there may be a sense where Mark realized the point of Paul: the Pagans could despise Jesus only insofar they saw him as a real messianist Jew lived in real History.
But in point of fact, Jesus's crucifixion was in another realm.