That Sinaiticus Show

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
User avatar
Jax
Posts: 704
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 6:10 am

Re: That Sinaiticus Show

Post by Jax » Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:49 pm

Steven Avery wrote:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 11:55 am
Sort of a silly waste-of-time comment - especially since I accept the authorship attribution of the Pastorals.
Based on what? What evidence convinces you that the pastorals are authentic to Paul?

Steven Avery
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am

Re: That Sinaiticus Show

Post by Steven Avery » Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:28 pm

We had a fine discussion of this on Xtalk back in 2005, on yahoogroups, still online.

Off-topic and a diversion on this thread.

User avatar
Jax
Posts: 704
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 6:10 am

Re: That Sinaiticus Show

Post by Jax » Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:51 pm

Steven Avery wrote:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:28 pm
We had a fine discussion of this on Xtalk back in 2005, on yahoogroups, still online.

Off-topic and a diversion on this thread.
Link?

Steven Avery
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am

Re: That Sinaiticus Show

Post by Steven Avery » Tue Sep 03, 2019 3:28 pm

Here is a post where I discussed Paul quoting Luke as scripture in 1 Timothy 5:18

[XTalk] Re: Dating of Mark
Steven Avery - Sept 17,2005
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/cro ... pics/19565

There was actually some good support for Paul-Timothy-Luke reference, based on the sameness of words and probability.
However, I do not think I have the full discussion bookmarked as one unit.

There was also a discussion on Xianity, that one was on 2 Peter.

Beyond that, anything more needs its own thread separate from this Sinaiticus study.

User avatar
Jax
Posts: 704
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 6:10 am

Re: That Sinaiticus Show

Post by Jax » Tue Sep 03, 2019 4:12 pm

Steven Avery wrote:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 3:28 pm
Here is a post where I discussed Paul quoting Luke as scripture in 1 Timothy 5:18

[XTalk] Re: Dating of Mark
Steven Avery - Sept 17,2005
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/cro ... pics/19565

There was actually some good support for Paul-Timothy-Luke reference, based on the sameness of words and probability.
However, I do not think I have the full discussion bookmarked as one unit.

There was also a discussion on Xianity, that one was on 2 Peter.

Beyond that, anything more needs its own thread separate from this Sinaiticus study.
Thank you

Steven Avery
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am

Re: That Sinaiticus Show

Post by Steven Avery » Tue Sep 03, 2019 10:06 pm

Yw. I should consider extracting the highlights of the thread. James McGrath made a legitimate contribution, and a poster or two on the more skeptical side was refreshingly honest about the probability question on the words 1 Timothy 5:8 being compared to the Luke verse. And we went over 5 or 10 arguments in general, if I remember right.

Post Reply