gryan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 3:27 amOn history as recorded outside the writings of the New Testament:arnoldo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 8:45 pm
This argument seems to be along the lines of Jerome Murphy-O'Connor's chronology in Paul: A Critical Life.
"Aretas IV Philopatris (Arabic: حارثة الرابع Ḥāritat in Nabataean)[1] was the King of the Nabataeans from roughly 9 BC to 40 AD."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aretas_IV_Philopatris
This is the history connection made by Crossen in his book on archeology and history relevant to study of the life and times of Paul. It was Crossen's book that got me into this type of inquiry in the first place.
Arnaldo, I think Crossen and Murphy-O'Conner are pretty much on the same page.
Jax, I accept Crossen's dating of Paul's epistles.
Paul only / Damascus chronology
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
Could you give me the title of this book please.gryan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 3:27 amOn history as recorded outside the writings of the New Testament:arnoldo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 8:45 pm
This argument seems to be along the lines of Jerome Murphy-O'Connor's chronology in Paul: A Critical Life.
"Aretas IV Philopatris (Arabic: حارثة الرابع Ḥāritat in Nabataean)[1] was the King of the Nabataeans from roughly 9 BC to 40 AD."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aretas_IV_Philopatris
To Arnoldo: This is the historical Aretas connection made by Crossen in his book on archeology and history relevant to study of the life and times of Paul. It was Crossen's book that got me into this type of inquiry in the first place. I think Crossen and Murphy-O'Conner are pretty much on the same page.
To Jax: I accept Crossen's view that the historical Aretas in question would date Paul's Damascus story to around CE 40.
Thanks
Λῆν
- Ben C. Smith
- Posts: 8994
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:18 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
I am going to guess In Search of Paul, by Crossan and Reed: https://www.amazon.com/Search-Paul-Apos ... 0060816163.Jax wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 6:13 amCould you give me the title of this book please.gryan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 3:27 amOn history as recorded outside the writings of the New Testament:arnoldo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 8:45 pm
This argument seems to be along the lines of Jerome Murphy-O'Connor's chronology in Paul: A Critical Life.
"Aretas IV Philopatris (Arabic: حارثة الرابع Ḥāritat in Nabataean)[1] was the King of the Nabataeans from roughly 9 BC to 40 AD."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aretas_IV_Philopatris
To Arnoldo: This is the historical Aretas connection made by Crossen in his book on archeology and history relevant to study of the life and times of Paul. It was Crossen's book that got me into this type of inquiry in the first place. I think Crossen and Murphy-O'Conner are pretty much on the same page.
To Jax: I accept Crossen's view that the historical Aretas in question would date Paul's Damascus story to around CE 40.
Thanks
Λῆν
ΤΙ ΕΣΤΙΝ ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
Thanks Ben. I have it on order.Ben C. Smith wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 7:54 amI am going to guess In Search of Paul, by Crossan and Reed: https://www.amazon.com/Search-Paul-Apos ... 0060816163.Jax wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 6:13 amCould you give me the title of this book please.gryan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 3:27 amOn history as recorded outside the writings of the New Testament:arnoldo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 8:45 pm
This argument seems to be along the lines of Jerome Murphy-O'Connor's chronology in Paul: A Critical Life.
"Aretas IV Philopatris (Arabic: حارثة الرابع Ḥāritat in Nabataean)[1] was the King of the Nabataeans from roughly 9 BC to 40 AD."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aretas_IV_Philopatris
To Arnoldo: This is the historical Aretas connection made by Crossen in his book on archeology and history relevant to study of the life and times of Paul. It was Crossen's book that got me into this type of inquiry in the first place. I think Crossen and Murphy-O'Conner are pretty much on the same page.
To Jax: I accept Crossen's view that the historical Aretas in question would date Paul's Damascus story to around CE 40.
Thanks
Λῆν
Λῆν
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
Yes, Ben, that's the book. Crossen is doing a speaking tour this summer and I'm planning to attend one of his retreats. So that's part of what spurred my interest.Ben C. Smith wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 7:54 am I am going to guess In Search of Paul, by Crossan and Reed: https://www.amazon.com/Search-Paul-Apos ... 0060816163.
Jax: Hope you enjoy the book!
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
Thank you. I will at least consider the contents.gryan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 3:34 pmYes, Ben, that's the book. Crossen is doing a speaking tour this summer and I'm planning to attend one of his retreats. So that's part of what spurred my interest.Ben C. Smith wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 7:54 am I am going to guess In Search of Paul, by Crossan and Reed: https://www.amazon.com/Search-Paul-Apos ... 0060816163.
Jax: Hope you enjoy the book!
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
Just as a sort of footnote to this:
Gal1.15
"But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and who called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son to me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, ..."
In my RSV it has a footnote to the bolded word to the effect that it is the Greek word 'en' usually translated as 'in'.
This changes the sense of Gal 1. 15 dramatically in that it changes god's revelation to Paul from an external event, a vision able to be seen by others perhaps, to an internal/inner change of self conciousness instead.
Perhaps sitting on a couch pondering the meaning of a section of OT scripture that he has just read and having an 'eureka' moment.
Whatever.
But quite unlike the multiply described external dramatic visions described in Acts.
Gal1.15
"But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and who called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son to me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, ..."
In my RSV it has a footnote to the bolded word to the effect that it is the Greek word 'en' usually translated as 'in'.
This changes the sense of Gal 1. 15 dramatically in that it changes god's revelation to Paul from an external event, a vision able to be seen by others perhaps, to an internal/inner change of self conciousness instead.
Perhaps sitting on a couch pondering the meaning of a section of OT scripture that he has just read and having an 'eureka' moment.
Whatever.
But quite unlike the multiply described external dramatic visions described in Acts.
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
The passage is RSV Gal 1:16 "ἀποκαλύψαι τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ ἐν ἐμοί" where the preposition ἐν modifies ἐμοί (dative case form), which in the locative sense means "in, on," but can also be taken in the instrumental sense, meaning "by" with a stress on means, so here "by means of me." FWIW, there is no use of the preposition in the dative sense of the Dative case form.yalla wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:44 pm Just as a sort of footnote to this:
Gal1.15
"But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and who called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son to me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, ..."
In my RSV it has a footnote to the bolded word to the effect that it is the Greek word 'en' usually translated as 'in'.
This changes the sense of Gal 1. 15 dramatically in that it changes god's revelation to Paul from an external event, a vision able to be seen by others perhaps, to an internal/inner change of self conciousness instead.
Perhaps sitting on a couch pondering the meaning of a section of OT scripture that he has just read and having an 'eureka' moment.
Whatever.
But quite unlike the multiply described external dramatic visions described in Acts.
DCH
Re: Paul only / Damascus chronology
Hi DCHindley, and DCH.DCHindley wrote: ↑Sun Jun 03, 2018 5:34 amThe passage is RSV Gal 1:16 "ἀποκαλύψαι τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ ἐν ἐμοί" where the preposition ἐν modifies ἐμοί (dative case form), which in the locative sense means "in, on," but can also be taken in the instrumental sense, meaning "by" with a stress on means, so here "by means of me." FWIW, there is no use of the preposition in the dative sense of the Dative case form.yalla wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:44 pm Just as a sort of footnote to this:
Gal1.15
"But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and who called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son to me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, ..."
In my RSV it has a footnote to the bolded word to the effect that it is the Greek word 'en' usually translated as 'in'.
This changes the sense of Gal 1. 15 dramatically in that it changes god's revelation to Paul from an external event, a vision able to be seen by others perhaps, to an internal/inner change of self conciousness instead.
Perhaps sitting on a couch pondering the meaning of a section of OT scripture that he has just read and having an 'eureka' moment.
Whatever.
But quite unlike the multiply described external dramatic visions described in Acts.
DCH
Thanks for your thoughtful comments.
Against the translation which I initially quoted, I'm in favor of "in me." The same expression (ἐν ἐμοί) appears again in the very next chapter: "I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me." Seiichi Yagi interprets the revelation of Christ "in me" as a kind of enlightenment experience, comparing it to 2 Cor. 4:6: "For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” made his light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of God’s glory displayed in the face of Christ." Yagi observed, "...it makes good sense that the Christ who was once revealed "in me" now "lives in me." Paul uses the expression in passages that express that which grounds his entire being."