An Assyriologist: "Descent of Ishtar/Inanna an allegory."

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
nightshadetwine
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 10:35 am

An Assyriologist: "Descent of Ishtar/Inanna an allegory."

Post by nightshadetwine »

I don't think we can really understand the writings of the NT(and Hebrew scriptures) without studying all of the religions of the ancient near east. There's reoccurring concepts that you find and, as I''ve said before, these concepts are concealed under allegory, symbolism, and metaphor. An Assyriologist has been trying to tell other scholars this since the 90s apparently. Here's an excerpt that explains what this Assyriologist says he has found:
http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/knpp ... 9intro.pdf
1. The prophecies have to be studied as integral parts and products of a larger religious structure, the ecstatic cult of Istar, which in its essence can be defined as an esoteric mystery cult promising its devotees transcendental salvation and eternal life.
2. Like Shakta Tantrism, the ecstatic cult of the Hindu mother goddess, the cult had a sophisticated cosmogony, theosophy, soteriology and theory of the soul, which were hidden from the uninitiated through a veil of symbols, metaphors and riddles and explained only to the initiates, who were bound to secrecy by oath.
3. The cornerstone of the cult's doctrine of salvation was the myth of Istar's descent to the netherworld, in which the Goddess plays the role of the
Neoplatonic Cosmic Soul. The first half of the myth outlines the soul's divine origin and fall, the latter half its way of salvation through repentance, baptism and gradual ascent toward its original perfection.
4. A central component of this doctrine was the concept of the heavenly perfect man sent for the redemption of mankind, materialized in the institution of kingship. In the Descent of I5tar, the king's redemptory role is expressed by the image of the shepherd king, Tammuz, given as lstar's
substitute to the "netherworld," that is, the material world. This image corresponds to the king's role as the earthly representative of God, and finds another expression in the portrayal of the king as the "sun of the people" (radiating heavenly brightness to the darkness of the world) and as an incarnation of the saviour god, Ninurta/Nabo, the vanquisher of sin, darkness and death.
5. The idea of perfection embodied in the king implied total purity from sin, implicit in the soul's divine origin and personified in the figure of the
goddess Mullissu, the queen of heaven, the Assyrian equivalent of the Holy Spirit. Doctrinally, the king's perfection was not self-acquired but heaven sent. Figuratively speaking, he was the son of Mullissu; and like the Byzantine emperor, he ruled through the Holy Spirit's inspiration. The mother-child relationship between the Goddess and the king, expressed through the image of a calf-suckling cow, is a constantly recurrent theme in the prophecies.
6. The king's perfection, homoousia with God, made him god in human form and guaranteed his resurrection after bodily death. For the devotees of Istar, who strove for eternal life emulating the Goddess, he was a Christ-like figure loaded with messianic expectations both as a saviour in this world and in the next.
7. The central symbol of the cult was the cosmic tree connecting heaven and earth, which contained the secret key to the psychic structure of the
perfect man and thus to eternal life. Other important symbols were the seven-staged ziggurat;' the rainbow; the full, waning and waxing moon; the
eight-pointed star; the calf-suckling cow and the child-suckling mother; the horned wild cow; the stag; the lion; the prostitute; the pomegranate; and so on. All these different symbols served to give visual form to basic doctrines of the cult while at the same time hiding them from outsiders, and thus amounted to a secret code, a "language within language" encouraging meditation and dominating the imagery and thinking of the devotees.
8. Beside transcendental meditation, the worship of the Goddess involved extreme asceticism and mortification of flesh, which when combined with
weeping and other ecstatic techniques could result in altered states, visions and inspired prophecy.
9. The cult of Istar, whose roots are in the sumerian cult of Inanna, has close parallels in the canaanite cult of Asherah, the phrygian cult of cybele
and the Egyptian cult of Isis, all of which were likewise prominently ecstatic in character and largely shared the same imagery and symbolism, including the sacred tree. The similarities between Assyrian and biblical prophecy - which cannot be dissociated from its canaanite context - can thus be explained as due to the conceptual and doctrinal similarities of the underlying religions, without having to resort to the implausible hypothesis of direct loans or influences one way or another.
10. The affinities with later Hellenistic and Greco-Roman religions and philosophies must be explained correspondingly. These systems of thought
were not the creations of an "Axial Age intellectual revolution" but directly derived from earlier ANE traditions, as is evident from the overall agreement of their metaphysical propositions and models with those of the Assyrian religion. while each of these religious and philosophical systems must be considered in its own right and against its own prehistory, it is likely that all of them had been significantly influenced by Assyrian imperial doctrines and ideology, which (taken over by the Achaemenid, Seleucid and Roman empires) continued to dominate the eastern Mediterranean world down to the end of classical antiquity.

The conceptual and doctrinal background of the prophecies will be analyzed and discussed in more detail in the first three chapters of this introduction. The aim throughout has been to concentrate on issues essential to the understanding of Assyrian prophecy as a religious phenomenon and to correlate the Assyrian data with related phenomena, especially or prophecy, Gnosticism and Jewish mysticism. I am fully aware that the issues tackled are extremely complex and would require several volumes, not a brief introduction, to be satisfactorily treated. Nevertheless, Ihave considered it essentially important not to limit the discussion to the Assyrian evidence alone but to take into consideration also the comparative evidence as fully as possible. The different sets of data are mutually complementary and it is not possible to understand one without the others. The intricate connection between mystery religion, esotericism and emperor cult, crucial to the understanding of ANE prophecy and the origins of ancient philosophy, emerges with full clarity only from the Assyrian evidence. on the other hand, the Assyrian sources, especially their symbolic imagery, cannot be fully understood without the supporting evidence of related traditions
On the descent of Ishtar:
To understand the Descent correctly it is essential to realize that it has nothing to do with "fertility" or "seasonal growth and decay" but, like the gnostic myth of the Fall of Sophia, addresses the question of man's salvation from the bondage of matter. Its protagonist is the "Neoplatonic" Cosmic Soul, personified as the goddess Hekate in the Chaldean Oracles. The first half of the myth presents the soul's heavenly origin and defilement in the "netherworld," i.e. the material world, the latter half outlines her way of Salvation. Like Sophia and Hekate Soteira, the goddess of the myth thus is a "two-faced" entity. Descending, she is the holy spirit entering the prison of the body; ascending, she is the penitent soul returning to her celestial home. This double role explains her contradictory figure, which combines the image of the Holy Spirit with that of the prostitute.
The affinity of the gnostic Sophia myth and the Descent of Istar is borne out by several considerations, most importantly by a Nag Hammadi treatise
entitled The Exegesis on the Soul. This text has been taken as a rephrasing of the Valentinian myth of Sophia; in actual fact, however, its narrative much more closely follows that of the Descent of Istar, to the extent that it could be considered a running commentary or a paraphrasis of the latter. In contrast with most gnostic texts, it is written in easily comprehensible, plain language, clearly meant to explain rather than to conceal. It thus offers a most valuable interpretive parallel to the Descent of Istar, whose heavily metaphorical and allegorical language served just the opposite purpose.
The descent of Istar is presented in terms of a stripping metaphor. she leaves her home as the queen of heaven, the wise, chaste and pure ''daughter
of the moon," dressed in her regal attire. At each gate of the netherworld, she has to take off one piece of her clothing, until she in the end arrives in the netherworld completely naked, stripped of all her virtues and powers. Her later ascent is expressed by reversing the metaphor: at each ofthe seven gates, she gets back a piece of clothing in an order mirroring that of their removal...
Tammuz, her brother and "the husband of her youth," must be given to the netherworld as her substitute. The sacrifice of Tammuz - an etiology for the death of the king as Son of God - constitutes the culmination of the whole myth and must be regarded as a functional equivalent of the redemptory death of Christ. As in Christianity, it paradoxically becomes a promise of eternal life for man. At the end of the myth we are told: "When Tammuz rises, the lapis lazuli pipe and the carnelian ring will rise with him, the male and female mourners will rise with him. May the dead rise and smell the incense!"
In sum, it seems certain that the Descent of Istar contained the basic tenets of an ecstatic mystery cult promising its followers absolution from sins,
spiritual rebirth and resurrection from the dead.
So here we have again the myth of the the soul descending into the physical realm where it "dies" or is "imprisoned" in the physical body/realm and then is "reborn" or "resurrected" when it ascends back to it's divine state as I talked about in these posts viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4545 and viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4574
Last edited by nightshadetwine on Sun Oct 07, 2018 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nightshadetwine
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 10:35 am

Re: An Assyriologist: "Descent of Ishtar/Inanna an allegory."

Post by nightshadetwine »

The intricate connection between mystery religion, esotericism and emperor cult,...
This is the key to understanding the story of the savior and the descent and ascent of the soul. It started out as a cult of the emperor/king and eventually took on the form of a personal salvation story for all individuals with an esoteric or allegorical meaning(the descent and ascent of the soul).

Some scholars have pointed out that the story of the savior/messiah/hero is based on the emperor/king.

The Search for God in Ancient Egypt By Jan Assmann:
The story...has to do with the divine descent of the royal child. Amun, king of the gods, decides to engender a new king in whose hands rule over the world will be placed, one who will build temples to deities and increase their offerings, and in whose time abundance and fertility will reign. A mortal woman strikes his fancy; Thoth the divine messenger ascertains that she is none other than the queen herself...Amun forms the name of the future child from the words the couple exchange...Thoth is sent to the queen to announce her pregnancy to her...divine nurses suckle the child, and deities bestow blessings on it. As the child grows, it is circumcised, purified, and presented to the assembled deities of the land as the new king...Here, in the myth of the divine birth of the king, we are told that the coronation of the king fulfills the will of the god who engendered the child and "socialized" it into the divine realm to rule as king of the world in peace and fear of god...The story of the divine descent of the royal child was first told of the three kings who began Dynasty 5...and included the title "Son of Re" in the official royal titulary...This fact suggests rather clearly that we are not dealing exclusively with a piece of official royal ideology, but with a concept that was related in the form of a story in various contexts and which must thus have had a certain general influence and popularity in ancient Egypt. The story is also familiar to us today and is still told in a variant that differs in only one respect from the Egyptian version: the kingdom of Christian tradition is not of this world. But Egyptian tradition prepared the way for even this transposition. At a specific point in Egyptian history, the myth changed it's form and it's point of reference. It became a festival drama that was enacted one or more times each year in all the larger temples in the land, and it referred, not to the birth of the king, but to that of the child god in respective temple triads. Now it was the new god who came into the world and ascended the throne. In this version, the emphasis of the myth shifted from it's legitimizing to it's explanatory and meaning-imparting function...Because welfare was no longer embodied in the king, a festival drama was enacted to relate--or, rather, celebrate--how a god had come to bring salvation into the world.
Biblical Narrative and Palestine's History: Changing Perspectives 2 By Thomas L. Thompson:
Another thematic element of major importance in Psalm 2's use of the messiah is the divine declaration or decree that he is Yahweh's son, born on that day by god (Ps. 2:7). This is comparable to the official publication of cosmic joy and good news at the accession to the throne of Rameses IV: 'O happy day! Heaven and earth are in joy, for you are the great lord of Egypt.' Similar to the messianic son of Yahweh of Psalm 2:7, Rameses IV is the son of Re. As Horus, Ramses, like Akhenaten before him, takes the throne of his father 'who sent him forth.' Similar to Ramses rule and protection over all nations, Psalm 2's king and messiah governs Yahweh's kingdom: the nations are in his patronage, which embraces the entire world. Like Merneptah, who banishes wrong at his accession and causes evildoers to fall on their face, Psalm 2's messiah is given the power to shatter and crush the nations. Finally, Psalm 2 closes with the phrase: 'happy are those who seek refuge in him,' a verse which reiterates the beatitudes of Psalm 1's eightfold contrast between the way of righteousness and the way of the ungodly. The announcement of Ramses IV's accession presents a similarly structured ninefold version of this poor man's song in order to describe the 'happy' day' for those who come under the king's divine patronage, a trope that plays a central role in the Bible's messianic tradition: "They who were fled have come back to their town; they who were hidden have come forth again. They who were hungry are sated and gay; they who were thirsty are drunken. They who were naked are clothed in fine linen; they who were dirty are clad in white. They who were in prison are set free; they who were fettered are in joy. But troublemakers have become peaceful."
The Messiah Myth: The Near Eastern Roots of Jesus and David By Thomas L. Thompson:
The frequent references to "the kingdom of God" in the gospels and sayings attributed to Jesus in the controversial gospel of Thomas all point to an earlier tradition: like king David before him, the Jesus of the Bible is an amalgamation of themes from near eastern mythology and traditions of kingship and divinity. The theme of a messiah--a divinely appointed king who restores the world to perfection--is typical of Egyptian and Babylonian royal ideology...
Scripture and Other Artifacts: Essays on the Bible and Archeology in Honor of Philip J. King edited by Philip J. King, Michael David Coogan, J. Cheryl Exum, Lawrence E. Stager:
A number of scholars have suggested that Isaiah's messianic oracles in chapters 9 and 11 were structured as enthronement or coronation hymns celebrating the accession of Hezekiah--or some other king--to the throne. One further body of archaelogical evidence is worth noting here which helps to validate this interpretation of the oracles. Over the years a number of Egyptian coronation hymns have been retrieved from several periods. They reveal patterns of content and imagery that can be found reflected in Isaiah's messianic oracles. To illustrate the similarities, it will suffice here to refer to two hymns that have been published in translation and are readily accessible to readers: the late-thirteenth-century BCE "Joy at the Accession of Mer-ne-Ptah" and the mid-twelfth-century "Joy at the Accession of Ramses IV". First of all, the Egyptian royal hymns typically describe the pharaoh as divinely "given" or "sent" by his father, the great god. "A lord--life, prosperity, health!--is given in all lands...the King of Upper and Lower Egypt"(Mer-ne-Ptah);"All the lands say to him: 'Gracious is the Horus upon the throne of his father Amon-Re, the god who sent him forth, the protector of the prince who carries off every land"(Ramesses IV). Isaiah's words in 9:6, "to us a son is given," may draw upon this established theme in coronation liturgy. The Egyptian hymns apply exalted titles to the pharaoh and describe his reign as eternal. Mer-ne-Ptah is described as "the lord of millions of years, great of kingship like Horus." Ramesses IV is greeted with the exclamation, "Thou ruler--life, prosperity, health!--thou art for eternity!" Isaiah says in 9:6-7, "His name will be called 'Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince Of Peace.' Of the increase of his government and of peace there will be no end." Egyptian royal theology provided a natural context for such exalted language. The pharaoh was asserted to be divinely incarnated and eternal. It is noteworthy that Isaiah employs similar imagery even though the subject of his oracle is clearly identified as a Davidic royal descendant--not a deity himself, but simply a charismatic human agent of the deity. The exalted titles in Isaiah 9:6, therefore, must be seen as applied not to the Davidic king but to the God whose powers are made manifest in him. The Egyptian hymns use superlative imagery also to extol the blessings that the new pharaoh brings to the land--typically peace, justice, and material prosperity. Of Mer-ne-Ptah's accession it is proclaimed: "Right has banished wrong. Evildoers have fallen (upon) their faces. All the rapacious are ignored. The water stands and is not dried up; the Nile lifts high. Days are long, nights have hours, and the moon comes normally." In other words, the new pharaoh has brought harmonious order both to society and to nature. The hymn to Ramesses IV echoes the same double theme: "They who were fled have come (back) to their towns; they who were hidden have come forth (again). They who were hungry are sated and gay; they who were thirsty are drunken...High Niles have come forth from their caverns, that they may refresh the hearts of the common people...The ships, they rejoice upon the deep. They have no (need of) ropes, for they come to land with wind and oars." Isaiah proclaims the same dual theme: the Davidic king will establish perfect justice in the community while perfect peace will permeate nature. "With righteousness he shall judge the poor, and decide with equity for the meek of the earth...The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard lie down with the kid"(Isa. 11:4,6). It need not be suggested that Isaiah was directly acquainted with Egyptian royal litanies. It is more likely that the prophet was consciously echoing the literary style and content of earlier Israelite coronation hymns and that they, in turn, quite understandably had appropriated established forms of royal ritual. By combining the archaeological evidence outlined above with a critical examination of the biblical texts, a compelling argument emerges that Isaiah's messianic oracles are, indeed, hymns celebrating the divinely installed king. They are most probably retrospective, however, presented not at Hezekiah's accession but after he had been on the throne for a number of years. The prophet has been inspired by the seemingly miraculous deliverance of 701 BCE to proclaim the king who could then be declared to have been divinely provided for this deliverance. Like other prophets, Isaiah not only looked to the future, he also sought to interpret the true meaning of past events. Here he proclaims that it was Yahweh who had "given" Hezekiah to his people--who had placed his spirit upon this ruler years before in order to prepare for this moment of crises.
So what we get in the Gospels and other stories of the savior gods is the story of the divine king, which goes back to ancient Egypt and Babylon, changed into a more personal salvation story(mystery cults). As Assmann says,
The story is also familiar to us today and is still told in a variant that differs in only one respect from the Egyptian version: the kingdom of Christian tradition is not of this world. But Egyptian tradition prepared the way for even this transposition. At a specific point in Egyptian history, the myth changed it's form and it's point of reference. It became a festival drama that was enacted one or more times each year in all the larger temples in the land, and it referred, not to the birth of the king, but to that of the child god in respective temple triads. Now it was the new god who came into the world and ascended the throne. In this version, the emphasis of the myth shifted from it's legitimizing to it's explanatory and meaning-imparting function...Because welfare was no longer embodied in the king, a festival drama was enacted to relate--or, rather, celebrate--how a god had come to bring salvation into the world.
andrewcriddle
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:36 am

Re: An Assyriologist: "Descent of Ishtar/Inanna an allegory."

Post by andrewcriddle »

Parpola's views are rather controversial see for example https://www.jstor.org/stable/606013?seq ... b_contents

Andrew Criddle
nightshadetwine
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 10:35 am

Re: An Assyriologist: "Descent of Ishtar/Inanna an allegory."

Post by nightshadetwine »

andrewcriddle wrote: Tue Oct 09, 2018 10:22 am Parpola's views are rather controversial see for example https://www.jstor.org/stable/606013?seq ... b_contents

Andrew Criddle
Yeah, I know. Not all of his views are controversial but definitely some of them. I find that some scholars tend to push back against comparing "pagan" religions to Christianity and get caught up in little details to try and make it sound like Christianity is this completely separate thing but that doesn't hold up. They also don't seem to "get" esoteric and allegorical interpretation of myths or are very skeptical of it, which is fair because there may not be enough evidence to "prove" that religions had an esoteric side to them seeing as the esoteric is more hidden.
Post Reply