Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
1 post • Page 1 of 1
So if who is sown is the Word, then Jesus is not the Sower but the sown Word. In other terms, his disiepta membra, after the his crucifixion by archons-demons, are sown to give origin to the world, before the creation.
This is the reason why pseudo-Hyppolitus refers that according to some heretic Christians, the Parable of Sower is allegory of the creation.
Then Mark 4:11-12 becomes more clear:
The Word is the sinister side of Jesus's nature.
So, by ignoring what is really the Word, who has not heard it is doomed from the beginning of the creation (his name being not found in the Book of Live) and therefore he has not to turn back.
And he is doomed from the beginning of the creation since the Word was sown before the creation of the world: Jesus was crucified before any age.
But then who is the Sower? The Sower may be who decreed the crucifixion of the Son: the supreme God for the Jewish-Christians, the demiurge for the Gnostics.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.