Jesus is a mere man and Christ is pure spirit.
Surely, it is only myself today in the world to argue that the separationism has an antinomianist origin in proto-Mark: the mere man Jesus is Sabaoth, the (son of the) demiurge (Yaldabaoth) who is converted (by the baptism) and becomes possessed by the Spirit of the supreme god (not the god of the Jews).
So w have both evidence of:
1) old traces of separationism
2) anti-YHWH clues connected with this separationism
Given that external evidence, I have therefore the right to apply the Criterion of Embarrassment on Luke 4:18 to prove that the late Gospels were really embarrassed by the separationism and the related antinomianism of the previous lost Gospels.
16 He went to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and on the Sabbath day he went into the synagogue, as was his custom. He stood up to read, 17 and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was handed to him. Unrolling it, he found the place where it is written:
18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”
20 Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him. 21 He began by saying to them, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”
18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”
20 Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him. 21 He began by saying to them, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”
The episode insists on the fact that there are not doubts about the real identity of the spirit who is possessing the mere man Jesus already from the baptism: that spirit is "of the Lord" (genitive possessive). I.e. of the creator. Who therefore is eo ipso the supreme god. Pace the Gnostics.
The embarrassment proves that the identity of the spirit who possessed the mere man Jesus was different from the "spirit of the Lord". It was the spirit of a higher god (not the god of the Jews). □