Romans 6:6 : Adam was crucified with Christ in the Garden of EDEN!!!!

[Giuseppe]

Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him [with Christ], that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

(Romans 6:6)

"hanged" (Hebrew root ŢLH) and not "crucified". And probably: "hanged on the wood, on the tree ".

And hanged on the tree of the “knowledge of the good and evil”: i.e., between the two thieves, one being good and the other being evil.

Probably the same "tree of resurrection".

And why was that tree in the Garden of Eden?

At the place where Jesus was crucified, there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb, in which no one had ever been laid.

(John 19:41)

So Jesus is not the possessor of the Eden, he is not YHWH:

15 He asked her, “Woman, why are you crying? Who is it you are looking for?”
Thinking he was the gardener, she said, “Sir, if you have carried him away, tell me where you have put him, and I will get him.”

(John 20:15)

[Secret Alias]

Oh boy. The idea goes something like this:

1. following the Philonic exegesis in the beginning there was a heavenly man created (Gen 1:26, 27)
2. then an earthly man created (Adam) Genesis 2
3. we are sons of Adam although some of the patriarchs were made with divine seed (i.e. god impregnating the wives of the Patriarchs)
4. we are made in the image of Adam.
5. Christianity assumes that we need the image and likeness of the first man (see 1 above) to become angelic (again)

[Giuseppe]

MŜYĤ/ Christ = 40 + 300 + 10 + 8 = 358
NĤŜ/ serpent = 50 + 8 + 300 = 358

So the Naassenes were a Jewish sect.

[Giuseppe]

YWĤNN/John = 52 = MŜYĤ/Christ

[Giuseppe]

When Adam('DM) was created, '’DM = 18 = ĤT’/sin. So Adam was a sinner, at the creation.


When Adam is glorified, he becomes The "Son of Man",
BN '’DM, of which the number in Gematria is 386. The same number of YŜWc/"Jesus-God savior".

[Giuseppe]

So Jesus is not the Gardener (=the possessor of Eden), after the resurrection. He resembles the Gardener.

[Giuseppe]

The names of the two thieves were known in Mcn, so Klinghardt.

Was the reason the fact that the good and the evil were known? Since the Jesus's tree was the Tree of Gnosis of Good & Evil.

[Giuseppe]

In Mark both the two thieves curse Jesus. Per Luke/Mcn, at least one of them was the Good Thieve. So in Mark there is still the theme of anomie: evil and good can't be distinguished.