The "sign of Jonah" = the BAPTISM IN SHEOL

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 13912
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

The "sign of Jonah" = the BAPTISM IN SHEOL

Post by Giuseppe »

Mark doesn't mention the sign of Jonah but Matthew does:

Matthew 12:38-39
38 Then some of the scribes and Pharisees told Jesus, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from you.”

39 But he replied to them, “An evil and adulterous generation craves a sign. Yet no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah

Greek σημεῖον sounds similar to jewish Shimon of Jonas = Simon bar Jonas = Simon Bariona , alias:

Simon the Zealot, Simon the Sicarius, and Simon Sicarius

So the sign is the War. This betrayes typical marcionite irony: the Jews reject the Good God therefore they deserve the War.
Last edited by Giuseppe on Sat Mar 07, 2020 1:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 13912
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: The "sign of Jonah" = the coming War

Post by Giuseppe »

bullshit.
Last edited by Giuseppe on Sat Mar 07, 2020 1:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 13912
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: The "sign of Jonah" = the coming War

Post by Giuseppe »

I have a new interpretation:

the "only sign given to this generation" is not a miracle, because Jesus did a lot of miracles.

It is the baptism. Since Jonas was immersed in the waters and then he resurrected.

Osiris was immersed in the waters of Nilo for 3 days and 3 nights before his resurrection: that was his "sign".

Hence the baptism originally was connected with the Death and the idea of resurrection.

No wonder that I think that the original baptism was given to Jesus in Sheol.

Image

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5021&start=90#p106919
Tertullian (Apologeticum 42) received the baptism only after his death.

Originallly, the baptism was given to the corpses of Christians. Not to Christians in life.

This is 100% expected if Jesus was baptized when he was in Sheol, too.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
Post Reply