Valentinian *mythicist* doctrine about a cosmic cross called Horos

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
Giuseppe
Posts: 5664
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Valentinian *mythicist* doctrine about a cosmic cross called Horos

Post by Giuseppe » Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:51 am


The animal and carnal Christ, however, does suffer after the fashion of the superior Christ, who, for the purpose of producing Achamoth, had been stretched upon the cross, that is, Horos, in a substantial though not a cognizable form. In this manner do they reduce all things to mere images — Christians themselves being indeed nothing but imaginary beings!

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0314.htm

Where is this cross (called Horos) placed, according this Valentian myth?

It is the celestial wall between the upper spheres and the lower heavens.

In order, then, that the shapelessness of the abortion might not at all manifest itself to the perfect Aeons, the Father also again projects additionally one Aeon, viz., Staurus. And he being begotten great, as from a mighty and perfect father, and being projected for the guardianship and defense of the Aeons, becomes a limit of the Pleroma, having within itself all the thirty Aeons together, for these are they that had been projected. Now this (Aeon) is styled Horos, because he separates from the Pleroma the Hysterema that is outside. And (he is called) Metocheus, because he shares also in the Hysterema. And (he is denominated) Staurus, because he is fixed inflexibly and inexorably, so that nothing of the Hysterema can come near the Aeons who are within the Pleroma.

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050106.htm

In short: the cosmic cross.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.

Post Reply