I am sorry - I should have added some context, for I see that I have misled you.Mental flatliner wrote:I don't take Eusebius to be a valid source for many reasons:Roger Pearse wrote:Eusebius gives 2016 AA, which seems to be about 1 BC in our reckoning, in the 194th Olympiad, for the birth of Christ; and dies in year 18 of Tiberius, AA 2047, about 31 AD I think.
http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/jerom ... _part2.htm
Eusebius of Caesarea is the father of modern chronolography, because he was the first to attempt to gather all the various dating systems and construct a world chronology, using the novel book-with-pages format to tabulate it. He was often wrong, - he didn't know that there were three emperors named Gordian rather than two, for instance - and of course he was at the mercy of some very dodgy source material, and he had no access to AD and BC - AA he invented himself. In that url, the calculation of AD and BC is mine, based on what the sources I had were. But I wondered what he said, because it is interesting to see a first attempt.
True. The interest is that he was living in the ancient world in Palestine.1--He was born 300 years after Jesus and can do nothing more than rely on other sources (like the ones I'm using) (etc)
All the best,
Roger