Note that Nezer is there, as well.Secret Alias wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 11:34 amTodah as a name associated with Jewish messianism.Sanhedrin 43 Our Rabbis taught: Yeshu had five disciples, Matthai, Nakai, Nezer, Buni and Todah. When Matthai was brought [before the court] he said to them [the judges] ...
The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
Moderator: andrewcriddle
- Ben C. Smith
- Posts: 8994
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:18 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
ΤΙ ΕΣΤΙΝ ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ
-
- Posts: 18922
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
John 1:17. There is no 'but' in John only ἡ
Last edited by Secret Alias on Fri Oct 25, 2019 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
You are the guy that only a minute before (sic) has talked about the importance of the name Joshua as successor of Moses.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
-
- Posts: 18922
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
It's important. But it's important in its original context.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
typical answer of a harmonizer. The antithesis between law and grace is evident in that verse, with or without "but".
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
-
- Posts: 18922
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
Ignore my when but there is no adversative conjunction in the Greek text
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
- Ben C. Smith
- Posts: 8994
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:18 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
I was wondering....Secret Alias wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 11:41 am Ignore my when but there is no adversative conjunction in the Greek text
ΤΙ ΕΣΤΙΝ ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ
-
- Posts: 18922
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
Supposed to be working ...
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
-
- Posts: 18922
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
Giuseppe you can't argue that Joshua was used in an antithetical sense when the Pentateuch clearly contextualized who or what Joshua was. Joshua might have been greater than Moses (even though he only lived to 110). But it is beyond anything rational to claim that a Joshua was invented who opposed Moses. There is nothing in the Pentateuch or Joshua which would support this idea. It is typically outlandish nonsense from you.
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Re: The name change to Jesus/Joshua.
I am not interested about the possibility that "a Joshua was invented who opposed Moses". I accept the idea that the early hallucinators of Jesus adored also Moses as Jews. My point is that later someone came and interpreted Jesus as an anti-Moses and that someone was the author of the first gospel.Secret Alias wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2019 11:47 am Giuseppe you can't argue that Joshua was used in an antithetical sense when the Pentateuch clearly contextualized who or what Joshua was. Joshua might have been greater than Moses (even though he only lived to 110). But it is beyond anything rational to claim that a Joshua was invented who opposed Moses. There is nothing in the Pentateuch or Joshua which would support this idea. It is typically outlandish nonsense from you.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.