Mythicist Representations of Jesus in Ancient & Medieval Art

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
perseusomega9
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:19 am

Re: Mythicist Representations of Jesus in Ancient & Medieval

Post by perseusomega9 »

lol, thanks Andrew
The metric to judge if one is a good exegete: the way he/she deals with Barabbas.

Who disagrees with me on this precise point is by definition an idiot.
-Giuseppe
Stephan Huller
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:59 pm

Re: Mythicist Representations of Jesus in Ancient & Medieval

Post by Stephan Huller »

Andrew,

The same thing reappears in De Recta in Deum Fide. It's always the eesh theophany cf. Hamori http://books.google.com/books?id=0gePQr ... ds&f=false

Thanks for that mention. Makes me feel less crazy.
Last edited by Stephan Huller on Thu May 15, 2014 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Stephan Huller
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:59 pm

Re: Mythicist Representations of Jesus in Ancient & Medieval

Post by Stephan Huller »

The same question is also raised by Celsus against the Marcionites - Adv Cels 5:52

"Let us then pass over the refutations which might be adduced against the claims of their teacher, and let him be regarded as really an angel. But is he the first and only one who came (to men), or were there others before him? If they should say that he is the only one, they would be convicted of telling lies against themselves. For they assert that on many occasions others came, and sixty or seventy of them together, and that these became wicked, and were cast under the earth and punished with chains, and that from this source originate the warm springs, which are their tears; and, moreover, that there came an angel to the tomb of this said being--according to some, indeed, one, but according to others, two--who answered the women that he had arisen. For the Son of God could not himself, as it seems, open the tomb, but needed the help of another to roll away the stone. And again, on account of the pregnancy of Mary, there came an angel to the carpenter, and once more another angel, in order that they might take up the young Child and flee away (into Egypt). But what need is there to particularize everything, or to count up the number of angels said to have been sent to Moses, and others amongst them? If, then, others were sent, it is manifest that he also came from the same God. But he may be supposed to have the appearance of announcing something of greater importance (than those who preceded him), as if the Jews had been committing sin, or corrupting their religion, or doing deeds of impiety; for these things are obscurely hinted at."
Post Reply