But Epiphanius hasn't previously mentioned Marcellina. He is reading directly from Hegesippus and this word is retained. What Lawlor doesn't notice is that the specific form of the name of 'Carpocrates' is interesting - Καρποκρᾶς. Already Celsus cites the name of the sect as those of Harpocrates. But now Καρποκρᾶς is to Carpocrates as Ἁρποκρᾶς https://www.trismegistos.org/ref/514139 is to Ἁρποκράτης. I don't know how the extra letter got in front of the name. But notice that Epiphanius seems to think Cerinthos might have had a mistaken k put before it too.In Anicetus’ time then, as I said, the Marcellina I have spoken of appeared at Rome spewing forth the corruption of Carpocrates’ teaching, and corrupted and destroyed many there.
ἐν χρόνοις τοίνυν, ὡς ἔφημεν, Ἀνικήτου ἡ προδεδηλωμένη Μαρκελλίνα ἐν Ῥώμῃ γενομένη τὴν λύμην τῆς Καρποκρᾶ διδασκαλίας ἐξεμέσασα πολλοὺς τῶν ἐκεῖσε λυμηναμένη ἠφάνισε.
Lawlor also notices:
Ἦλθεν δὲ εἰς ἡμᾶς ἤδη πως Μαρκελλίνα τις ὑπ' αὐτῶν ἀπατηθεῖσα, ἣ πολλοὺς ἐλυμήνατο ἐν χρόνοις Ἀνικήτου ἐπισκόπου Ῥώμης, τοῦ μετὰ τὴν διαδοχὴν Πίου καὶ τῶν ἀνωτέρω. ἐν Ῥώμῃ γὰρ γεγόνασι 1.309 πρῶτοι Πέτρος καὶ Παῦλος οἱ ἀπόστολοι αὐτοὶ καὶ ἐπίσκοποι, εἶτα Λίνος εἶτα Κλῆτος εἶτα Κλήμης, σύγχρονος ὢν Πέτρου καὶ Παύλου, οὗ ἐπιμνημονεύει Παῦλος ἐν τῇ πρὸς Ῥωμαίους ἐπιστολῇ.