Re: Was the birth story in Luke/Matthew originally referred to John the Baptist
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 9:01 pm
So I am a "total idiot" for rejecting your preconceptions about an entirely hypothetical scenario?
So the Jews/"Judiazers"...
Wrote of themselves as rejecting their Christ in favour of a murderer named Barabbas...
... then had the wherewithal to write that the Romans executed their messiah as a means to circumvent their original rejection of him...
... even though, had they the machinations and and abilities that you say they would have...
... the scene would have been Jesus being stoned by the Jews, and not crucified by the Romans, as those who execute the Christ are those who accept him as such.
When the centurion and those who were with him, keeping watch over Jesus, saw the earthquake and what took place, they were filled with awe and said, “Truly this was the Son of God!”
The Romans are the one's who accepts Christ as the saviour. Not the Jews.
There is no logic to you. Just a stream of consciousness of inane ramblings.
In Marcion's theology, Chrestus never came down to earth.In a Marcionite universe, the Jews kill (by using Pilate) a Christ-who-is-not-their-Christ. Basically, they kill an alien.
But now Pilate is a ploy of the Marcionites, and not the Judiazers? Make up your fucking mind.
I ignore your insane and incoherent babblings.You can't ignore this difference between a Jewish victim and an alien. But you ignore this because you are a total troll without even a bit of intelligence.