It seems that the original reading was:
In this way you can resolve the contradiction of a James being famous per se, hence without need of being recognized by specifying who is his brother (the quasi vanishing figure named John son of Zebedee).
Note that in this way we have an identical "baptism of blood" for the two sons of Zebedee.
Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
1 post • Page 1 of 1