Page 7 of 7

Re: Convince me that 1 Clement knew a Gospel

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 6:51 pm
by Ben C. Smith
Aleph One wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 6:29 pmCan anyone say whether the Greek of the 2nd line from Chapter 47 implies the start of the existence of the gospel, or just the start of Paul's preaching of it to them, perhaps? I think this is it:
τι πρωτον υμιν εν αρχη του ευαγγελιου εγραψεν
It literally says, "what he first wrote to you in the beginning of the gospel." Its exact meaning is controversial.

Re: Convince me that 1 Clement knew a Gospel

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:11 am
by mlinssen
Ben C. Smith wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 6:51 pm
Aleph One wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 6:29 pmCan anyone say whether the Greek of the 2nd line from Chapter 47 implies the start of the existence of the gospel, or just the start of Paul's preaching of it to them, perhaps? I think this is it:
τι πρωτον υμιν εν αρχη του ευαγγελιου εγραψεν
It literally says, "what he first wrote to you in the beginning of the gospel." Its exact meaning is controversial.
Ben, isn't https://archive.org/stream/BaillyDictio ... 2/mode/1up saying that this is a substantive?

I'm wondering about the -ον of πρωτον. Then again I just woke up

And a wondrous sentence indeed...

Re: Convince me that 1 Clement knew a Gospel

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:59 am
by Aleph One
Ben C. Smith wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 6:51 pmIt literally says, "what he first wrote to you in the beginning of the gospel." Its exact meaning is controversial.
Hmmm quite interesting (thank you). I can see why.
hakeem wrote: Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:35 pm 1st Clement is a very late writing ---later than Acts of the Apostles and even later than Irenaeus' "Against Heresies".

The martyrdom of Peter and Paul is found in 1st Clement but unknown in Acts of the Apostles and Irenaeus' "Against Heresies".
Neither here nor there, but this has piqued my interest as well.

Re: Convince me that 1 Clement knew a Gospel

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 6:49 am
by Ben C. Smith
mlinssen wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:11 amBen, isn't https://archive.org/stream/BaillyDictio ... 2/mode/1up saying that this is a substantive?
No. This is an adjective which is often used adverbially, as well.

Re: Convince me that 1 Clement knew a Gospel

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:48 pm
by Bernard Muller
Aleph One wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 7:29 pm
Can anyone say whether the Greek of the 2nd line from Chapter 47 implies the start of the existence of the gospel, or just the start of Paul's preaching of it to them, perhaps? I think this is it:
τι πρωτον υμιν εν αρχη του ευαγγελιου εγραψεν
Ben wrote:
It literally says, "what he first wrote to you in the beginning of the gospel." Its exact meaning is controversial.
I think "Clement" was meaning by "in the beginning of the gospel": when he first preached to you (that would be in 50-52 for 2.5 years) because that time of preaching is connected with Apollos and Peter getting followers from Paul's converts soon after.
That cannot be the start of the existence of the gospel (in Corinth) because in 1 Thessalonians (1:7-8, 2:2, 3:1) and Acts (16:12-17:16), Paul already had preached his gospel in Philippi & Thessalonica before reaching Athens.

Cordially, Bernard

Re: Convince me that 1 Clement knew a Gospel

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:12 pm
by hakeem
Bernard Muller wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:48 pm
Aleph One wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 7:29 pm
Can anyone say whether the Greek of the 2nd line from Chapter 47 implies the start of the existence of the gospel, or just the start of Paul's preaching of it to them, perhaps? I think this is it:
τι πρωτον υμιν εν αρχη του ευαγγελιου εγραψεν
Ben wrote:
It literally says, "what he first wrote to you in the beginning of the gospel." Its exact meaning is controversial.
I think "Clement" was meaning by "in the beginning of the gospel": when he first preached to you (that would be in 50-52 for 2.5 years) because that time of preaching is connected with Apollos and Peter getting followers from Paul's converts soon after.
That cannot be the start of the existence of the gospel (in Corinth) because in 1 Thessalonians (1:7-8, 2:2, 3:1) and Acts (16:12-17:16), Paul already had preached his gospel in Philippi & Thessalonica before reaching Athens.

Cordially, Bernard
You have a problem. There is no evidence that the supposed Clement knew of any letter to the Thessalonians. In addition the letter to the Thessalonians does not state the author preached a gospel c50-52 CE.
And may I remind you that Acts of the apostles does not state Saul or Paul wrote letters to anyone.

Re: Convince me that 1 Clement knew a Gospel

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:35 pm
by hakeem
In order to determine what the supposed Clement knew about the Gospels one must first do some research on the character himself.
When did he live? When was he bishop of Rome?

A detailed search for Clement in Christian writings will show that he did not live at all so could not have been bishop of anywhere and wrote a letter to any Church.

The pattern is always consistent. Writings which appear to historicise Paul and his letters are always either forgeries, false attribution or fiction.