Bernard Muller wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:28 pm
Basilides was a Christian gnostic who extrapolated on Christian beliefs. He did not belong to a separate religion generated in Greece in the 4th century BC, even if Basilides was said to adopt Aristotle's systems.
Irenaeus and Hippolytus in their critiques of Basilides, also said his theories mentioned Christian items, such as Christ, god of the Jews, Jesus to be crucified, appearing on earth as a man who wrought miracles.
The fact Basilidies, a Valentinian or semi-Valentinian, is said to have mentioned or in fact didi Christian 'items' such as Christ or Jesus 'to be crucified' (?) doesn't mean he was a follower of Jesus of Nazareth, Bernard, or that he was even aware of him.
Bernard Muller wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:28 pm
[That
] Basilides
[is said by Irenaeus to have
] modif
[ied
] a passage from gMark & GMatthew about the role of Simon of Cyrene, the bearer of Jesus' cross, but
"so that this latter being transfigured by him, that he might be thought to be Jesus, was crucified, through ignorance and error, while Jesus himself received the form of Simon, and, standing by, laughed at them.".
The above is from Irenaeus.
Irenaeus was seeking to re-write history. What he says is likely the opposite of the truth. Many gnostic scholars will support that.
The descriptions of the Basilidian system given by Irenaeus (in his
Adversus Haereses) and Hippolytus (in his
Philosophumena/Refutations) are so strongly divergent that they seem to many quite irreconcilable. Historians, such as Philip Shaff, have the opinion that: "Irenaeus described a form of Basilideanism which was not the original, but a later corruption of the system. On the other hand, Clement of Alexandria and Hippolytus, in the fuller account of his
Philosophumena, probably drew their knowledge of the system directly from Basilides' own work, said to have been the
Exegetica."
Cement and Hippolytus recount a Matthias spoke mystical doctrines to Basilides and Isidore "his true child and disciple", which, in turn, Matthias had heard in private teaching from "the Saviour" (Clement,
Strom vii; Hippolytus,
Philosophumena VII,9)
Philosophumena VII,11 gives Basilides’ Account of the “Sonship” which says in part, near the end, -
This is the savour from the Holy Spirit borne down from above, as far as formlessness, and the interval (of space) in the vicinity of our world. And from this the Son began to ascend, sustained as it were, says (Basilides), upon eagles’ wings, and upon the back. For, he says, all (entities) hasten upwards from below, from things inferior to those that are superior.
Philosophumena VII,12 starts -
When, therefore, a first and second ascension of the Sonship took place, and the Holy Spirit itself also remained after the mode mentioned, the firmament was placed between the super-mundane (spaces) and the world. For existing things were distributed by Basilides into two continuous and primary divisions, and are, according to him, denominated partly in a certain (respect) world, and partly in a certain (respect) super-mundane (spaces). But the spirit, a line of demarcation between the world and super-mundane (spaces), is that which is both holy, and has abiding in itself the savour of Sonship. While, therefore, the firmament which is above the heaven is coming into existence, there burst forth, and was begotten from the cosmical Seed, and the conglomeration of all germs, the Great Archon (and) Head of the world, (who constitutes) a certain (species of) beauty, and magnitude, and indissoluble power.