Hadrian and the Christians

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
User avatar
stephan happy huller
Posts: 1480
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:06 pm
Contact:

Hadrian and the Christians

Post by stephan happy huller »

http://www.e-cademic.de/data/ebooks/ext ... 224702.pdf

This is a really exciting Italian book drawing from scholars in a number of disciplines which shows among other things that Christianity in Egypt at the time of Hadrian may have been more pluralistic.
The Second century played a key role in the development of ancient Christianity. From Pliny’s perception of the nova superstitio as separated from its Jewish roots to Celsus’ powerful attack on Christianity under Marcus Aurelius and thereafter, this period saw the wide social diffusion of Christianity, the flourishing of its early literary production according to the standard patterns of classical literacy 1 and above all its institutionalisation, centred on the emerging figures of the monarchic bishops 2. On the other hand, the Roman empire from Trajan to the Antonine dynasty enjoyed a relative political and military tranquillity (lasting almost until the last three decades of the century) and a great cultural effervescence, evidenced by phenomena such as the Neo- sophistic movement 3 or the philo-Hellenistic attitude of emperors like Hadrian. The aim of this book is to examine the connection between these two historical processes in order to figure out whether any specific factor within this broader context eased or accelerated the affirmation of Christianity in the Second century Roman world4. The emergence of Christian identities and ecclesiastical institutions and of Christianity’s relationship to the social and cultural reality of the Empire has received great attention in recent scholarship, from the point of view of which, the making of Christianity must be considered as a long term phenomenon, lasting three centuries or more; following the methodological suggestions of authors such as Foucault or Bourdieu, recent scholarship has stressed the role of discursive analysis and other socio-cultural hermeneutical tools in order to explain such historical transformation
Everyone loves the happy times
User avatar
Peter Kirby
Site Admin
Posts: 8617
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
Location: Santa Clara
Contact:

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by Peter Kirby »

Let's see if we can turn this thread back around...

It sounds like the argument is that the "tranquility" of the second century allowed Christianity to flourish. Certainly doesn't hurt, does it? It also says that the general literary flourishing corresponded with a similar literary flourishing within Christianity, as we observe in the second century starting with apologists such as Aristides, Quadratus, the writer of the Epistle To Diognetius, and Justin Martyr. Sounds about right too. (The middle third century was marked by chaos, in comparison, and perhaps with less opportunity and economic support for such literary endeavors.) Finally, the "making of Christianity must be considered as a long term phenomon, lasting three centuries or more," may have been one of the offending statements, but the author didn't mean it as an apologetic for the antiquity of Christianity but rather, apparently, as an invitation to people who focus on the earliest part of Christianity to recognize the necessity of analyzing the 2nd/3rd/4th centuries as well as whatever may have happened in the first.
"... almost every critical biblical position was earlier advanced by skeptics." - Raymond Brown
dewitness
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:09 am

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by dewitness »

Peter Kirby wrote:Let's see if we can turn this thread back around...

It sounds like the argument is that the "tranquility" of the second century allowed Christianity to flourish. Certainly doesn't hurt, does it? It also says that the general literary flourishing corresponded with a similar literary flourishing within Christianity, as we observe in the second century starting with apologists such as Aristides, Quadratus, the writer of the Epistle To Diognetius, and Justin Martyr. Sounds about right too. (The middle third century was marked by chaos, in comparison, and perhaps with less opportunity and economic support for such literary endeavors.) Finally, the "making of Christianity must be considered as a long term phenomon, lasting three centuries or more," may have been one of the offending statements, but the author didn't mean it as an apologetic for the antiquity of Christianity but rather, apparently, as an invitation to people who focus on the earliest part of Christianity to recognize the necessity of analyzing the 2nd/3rd/4th centuries as well as whatever may have happened in the first.
Aristides' Apology does not show that there was a literary flourishing within Christianity.

After about 100 years after the supposed Jesus it appears that it is the first time any Emperor would have heard about the beliefs of the Jesus cult of Christians when Aristides wrote his Apology to Hadrian.

1. There was NO tranquility for Christians c 115 CE.

Pliny's Letter to Trajan
Meanwhile, in the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have observed the following procedure: I interrogated these as to whether they were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I ordered executed.
Plus, Justin's Apology completely contradicts any tranquility in the 2nd century when he wrote to Antoninus claiming that Christians and he himself was hated and wantonly abused.

2. There was no tranquility for Christian c 150 CE.

Justin's Apology
To the Emperor Titus Ælius Adrianus Antoninus Pius Augustus Caesar, and to his son Verissimus the Philosopher, and to Lucius the Philosopher, the natural son of Caesar, and the adopted son of Pius, a lover of learning, and to the sacred Senate, with the whole People of the Romans, I, Justin, the son of Priscus and grandson of Bacchius, natives of Flavia Neapolis in Palestine, present this address and petition in behalf of those of all nations who are unjustly hated and wantonly abused, myself being one of them.


3. There was NO tranquility for Christians c 175-180 CE.

Athenagoras Plea For the Christians
[But for us who are called Christians you have not in like manner cared; but although we commit no wrong--nay, as will appear in the sequel of this discourse, are of all men most piously and righteously disposed towards the Deity and towards your government--you allow us to be harassed, plundered, and persecuted, the multitude making war upon us for our name alone.
User avatar
stephan happy huller
Posts: 1480
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by stephan happy huller »

Its great to see aa's posting style in full color. Adds so much to the experience
Everyone loves the happy times
User avatar
Peter Kirby
Site Admin
Posts: 8617
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
Location: Santa Clara
Contact:

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by Peter Kirby »

The "tranquility" referred to economic and political stability and had no reference to the persecution (or not) of Christians. In any case, persecution is a relevant factor. Indeed, persecution, on any scale (as that is frequently debated), is an evident catalyst for the apologetics also. "Please stop punishing us due to false accusations, Mr Roman, sir" could be taken as the basic rhetorical point of several of these apologies.
"... almost every critical biblical position was earlier advanced by skeptics." - Raymond Brown
Roger Pearse
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:26 am

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by Roger Pearse »

I wonder, tho. In a way, could it equally be said that the church made little progress during these stable times? We start getting men of serious social status -- Tertullian, Minucius Felix, Cyprian -- becoming leaders at the end of this period, after the murders of Commodus and Pertinax. It's worth considering that in the same period Roman law starts to collapse. The jurists of the second century end up getting murdered. A point arrives during the 3rd century at which someone says that "whatever the emperor wants, that is the law".

Could it be argued, then, that the real impetus to Christianity arises during a period in which Roman society is visibly failing, with the endless series of usurper emperors?
User avatar
stephan happy huller
Posts: 1480
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by stephan happy huller »

There must have been enough Christians in 177 CE to justify the persecutions in Gaul. If they were some insignificant group, why persecute them?
Everyone loves the happy times
User avatar
Peter Kirby
Site Admin
Posts: 8617
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
Location: Santa Clara
Contact:

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by Peter Kirby »

The interesting discussion on the dating of the Pentateuch has been split out to the Jewish Texts and History forum.

The discussion about the evolution of Judaism (or not) also has been.
"... almost every critical biblical position was earlier advanced by skeptics." - Raymond Brown
User avatar
Peter Kirby
Site Admin
Posts: 8617
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
Location: Santa Clara
Contact:

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by Peter Kirby »

This paper does a lot to support Pearse's contention that instability was more valuable than stability for growth in numbers:

http://gmir.ru/ecclesia/word/Christian% ... ations.doc

To judge by the literary output of the second century and early third century, though, stability might have done more for the literary expression of faith. Perhaps it's my inexperience talking, but despite growing numbers, there appear to be fewer great literary productions in the period between Origen and Eusebius.
"... almost every critical biblical position was earlier advanced by skeptics." - Raymond Brown
User avatar
DCHindley
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:53 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Hadrian and the Christians

Post by DCHindley »

Oops!

That link is deader than a doorknob.

DCH
Peter Kirby wrote:This paper does a lot to support Pearse's contention that instability was more valuable than stability for growth in numbers:

http://gmir.ru/ecclesia/word/Christian% ... ations.doc

To judge by the literary output of the second century and early third century, though, stability might have done more for the literary expression of faith. Perhaps it's my inexperience talking, but despite growing numbers, there appear to be fewer great literary productions in the period between Origen and Eusebius.
Post Reply